Comment Re:EU law (Score 1) 455
Who did you vote?
While you are right, Alcor themselves don't seem to have built up any gold reserve to ensure their survival (maybe I'm wrong, I didn't spend too much time checking). On the topic of their finances, their FAQ states: "The rest of the Trust investments are held at the investment firm of Morgan Stanley."
In other words, they have the money invested, probably in low-risk form as we are talking of hundreds of years. It isn't bound to be melting away in a few moments
Banks often move money to gold in times such as this, and I'm sure banks (being smart players as they are!) are doing just this. This is why the market price of gold has gone up lately, even though historically it always averages on the same price.
But as mentioned, that money is held by Trust, probably just so that the company can not use the money for operating costs. The company itself can still collapse, while the Trust would be bursting in money. I wonder what would happen to the funds then?
Then there's your certainty that the company will survive for the hundreds or thousands of years it will take for technology to be at the point where they can revive you. That's incredibly unlikely, since no company in history has survived for that long (your arguments about financial stability are laughable, since there will almost certainly be several currency devaluations and government, society, and world upheavals in that period). I put the chances of you actually staying frozen for 1000 years at basically zero.
The oldest company in the world reached well over 1400 years before it fell to hard times. Link. Other old companies can be found here.
And even if we were to accept your argument of losing money over long-term (which history has shown to be false, even during turbulent times such as these), the value of gold has stayed fairly same for most of the human existence.
However, I'm not sure about the chances of getting resurrected, but that's a whole other subject right there.
The Schengen Area is a group of twenty-five European countries which have abolished all border controls between each other.[...]Implementing the Schengen rules involves eliminating border controls with other Schengen members while simultaneously strengthening border controls with non-member states. The rules include provisions on common policy on the temporary entry of persons (including the Schengen visa), the harmonisation of external border controls, and cross-border police and judicial co-operation.
Regulation of external border controls Schengen also requires member countries to apply strict checks on people entering or exiting the area. These checks are co-ordinated by the European Union's Frontex agency, and subject to common rules. The details of border controls, surveillance, and the conditions under which permission to enter into the Schengen area may be granted are exhaustively detailed in a European Union regulation called Schengen Borders Code.
It can be found here.
As Schengen is an EU-project with inclusion of additional countries due to earlier agreements, we can talk about "EU Airports". Also; EU might not be a state, but it's a confederation (de facto, if not de jury), no matter how certain people would like to claim otherwise.
1) Usually pro-filesharers try to make it sound like filesharing is usual activity and try go for most or 70-90% user share
It probably is 70-90% in certain age groups. The biggest file-sharers would be people without money and with good computer skills. This means mostly people under 25, as older people have less need to obtain their entertainment illegally. After all, to get the population to 90% file-sharers, it means that grannies and tottlers both would have to take part!
As far as the usability of the report goes... even as we can assume that 1176 people is big enough group (apparently with around 5% margin of error), they basically tweaked every possible figure upwards. Instead of 33 million users of Internet, let's say 40 million (I'm sure there's official records for this), people will lie, so let's adjust to that (why would people lie in anonymous poll?) and lastly, YOU DON'T SHORTHAND THE +/- PART INTO POSITIVE AND ADD TO THE RESULTS.
Not to mention that some of the sourced research was reported wrong. The same author, but different funding and parametres.
Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.