Comment Re:Oh, Please. . . (Score 3, Interesting) 158
That's the biggest load of Malarkey I've ever read!
Far from it in my opinion. I suspect you don't like it because he is not taking a scientific argument, but a philosophical one. It's the same argument as Plato's Allegory of the Cave, and Descartes's Discourse of a Method.
It seem his argument is we're living in a simulation, so it doesn't matter if our software captures something different that what our eyes perceive. Claiming the camera produces a "fake" image will not win this argument, because there is no reality.
To win this argument, it should be stated that the human eye is considered the standard by which all cameras should be measured. This technology does not move closer to reproducing the images the human eye does, but instead moves farther away. By that standard, this technology produces low quality images.