Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not a troll on the surface. (Score 1) 147

It's the same as the case about all-in-one printers. The relevant troll was not suing HP or Brother. The relevant troll was suing companies who perhaps bought an HP or Brother printer with the capabilities described in the relevant patent.

Most of these cases are probably bogus for the same reason.

As much as I would like to enjoy some shadenfreude at Apple's expense, they should not be subjected to this kind of nonsense any more than anyone else.

Comment Re:Let's dumb it down for everyone (Score 1) 778

Except dumb people complain anyways.

Although this isn't really about "dumb", it's about lazy. Many people that seem "dumb" really are just lazy. They choose to be helps and there is simply no helping the helpless. You cannot dumb things down enough for them. Sooner or later their faux helplessness will manifest again.

Enabling helpless and lazy only encourages more of it.

Comment Re:why? (Score 2) 778

Yes. Forgot about this bit. NoScript isn't just about security. It's also about performance. A lot of the extra nonsense that sites run just isn't necessary. It doesn't significantly impact the desired user experience to have all of that random crap turned off.

It's much like food labeling or processes running on your PC.

If you don't recognize it, chances are that it's to be avoided.

Comment Re:why? (Score 4, Interesting) 778

Except I don't have to avoid Javascript entirely.

I can do it selectively.

I can decide who to let into my circle of trust.

Given what kind of random crap seems to be on modern websites these days. That's a very good idea. It's not paranoia when people really out to get you. Trying to deny the danger is the position that's really out of touch with reality.

YOU are the one that's a danger to self and others, not me.

Juvenile insults won't change that.

Comment Re:#1 reason this is stupid (Score 1) 232

These devices are the next evolutionary step of phones and mp3 players. They have been sold as purely entertainment devices for pretty much their entire lifespan. The notion that kids will just reprise the old "comic book behind the text book" cliche' seems like an obvious problem.

The kids might even be able to adapt to the attempts to manage these devices.

The smartest people in the room are the ones that you are trying to keep from treating these things like toys.

Comment Re:Crippled crap... (Score 1) 232

You've really not done much to raise the bar here.

An e-book reader is all you came up with.

On the other hand, there's some value to having a great pile of books on hand. As others have stated, e-book readers are a very poor interface for dealing with reference material. I would also add to that that they are also a poor interface for exploration in general including the kind you might expect from a kid being able to sit in front of a shelf of actual encyclopedias.

All of the pizzazz and flim flam haven't quite managed to replicate that really.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...