How the hell are non-Chinese, for example, every going to figure out how to type a Chinese address?
Visit a dictionary site, lookup the words they need via Pinyin or English, and copy-paste into the URL field. Or, use a Chinese Javascript IME website. Or, write it down somewhere and type it directly via Punycode (probably possible). Or, find the site via Google based on a term they can remember (that's the only time I use "I'm Feeling Lucky", e.g. I search "ascii table" rather than remember if it's asciitable.com, asciitable.org, ascii-table.com, etc.).
People will figure out strategies to make use of these URLs.
The simplest one: write it down. It's not like the spelling of Hudong or Zhongguo is obvious when you have only heard it.
I do work for Vestas in the UK, you are exactly right. Blade building is currently very labour intensive, I've actually worked on the shop floor for a week. There were protests at the Vestas factory on the Isle of Wight when it was closed down, even though it clearly didn't make economic sense to builds the blades in the UK with high labour costs while almost all the blades (for V82 1.6MW turbines) are sold to the USA and China. So Vestas decided to build new factories in the US and China instead.
The bigger question is, why is Vestas, a Danish Company, the biggest wind turbine producer in the world with ~25-30% market share? How come countries like the USA, Germany who gave billions to Boeing, Siemens, GE and the like for wind turbine research and had nothing to show for it, and everyone ended up using the iconic three bladed "Danish" design?
The answer boils down to having smart people in the government, avoiding overly ambitious expensive projects that often ended in failure, having a long turn vision in providing continued support in good times and bad times.
Having written an AHCI driver and worked endlessly on USB driver code there's no real point comparing the two. SATA is far, far, FAR more reliable. End of discussion. The USB chipset specs are horrid and the chipset implementations are even worse. Most chipsets barely pass through standard I/O operations properly and rarely deal with things like disk synchronization or even proper serial number reporting (for the USB bridge chips). USB has far higher cpu processing overheads and the DMA specs or so bad the driver often has to create bounce buffers. Command queueing overhead for a USB chipset is ridiculously huge compared to SATA chipsets.
USB is fine for a portable drive but only a complete fool uses USB if they need reliable mass storage.
E-SATA has its issues but they are nothing compared to the mess you get when you connect a drive up through USB. Frankly the only time one hits the 300 MByte/sec limit with today's SATA/E-SATA in a way that actually negatively impacts a production system is when one is talking to multiple targets over a port multiplier, on a single SATA port. The real need for 6GBit E-SATA is to better support port multipliers and not so much for SSDs.
While it is true that an SSD can hit the current 300 MByte/sec limit over SATA, there aren't really any realistic production loads against single drives (verses port multipliers) where an improvement in the bandwidth would actually improve the machine's ability to handle its workload.
-Matt
as someone who has used samba, he is responsible for one of the worst configuration file formats ever
Let's see your alternative to it, then. Show us all a better way.
From the image how would you differentiate the systems running Linux or Mac OS X?
An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.