Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Employee Happiness and Business Success Are Linked, Study Finds (economist.com) 125

A new study (PDF) by Christian Krekel, George Ward and Jan-Emmanuael de Neve finds a link between employee happiness and business success. "The study, based on data compiled by Gallup, a polliging organization, covers nearly 1.9 million employees across 230 separate organizations in 73 countries," reports The Economist. From the report: The authors studied four potential measures of corporate performance: customer loyalty, employee productivity, profitability and staff turnover. They found that employee satisfaction had a substantial positive correlation with customer loyalty and a negative link with staff turnover. Furthermore, worker satisfaction was correlated with higher productivity and profitability. Of course, correlation does not prove causality. It could be that working for a successful firm makes employees more contented, rather than the other way round. However, the authors cite studies of changes within individual firms and organizations which seem to show that improvements in employee morale precede gains in productivity, rather than the other way round.

What might explain the link? One school of thought, known as human relations theory, has long argued that higher employee well-being is associated with higher productivity, not least because happy workers are less prone to absenteeism or quitting. However, as the authors of the paper admit, there is very little research on the best measures that managers can take to improve employee well-being, or indeed which are the most cost-effective. Rather like the judge's famous dictum about obscenity, a well-run company may be hard to define but we can recognize it when we see it. Workers will be well informed about a company's plans and consulted about the roles they will play. Staff will feel able to raise problems with managers without fearing for their jobs. Bullying and sexual harassment will not be permitted. Employees may work hard, but they will be allowed sufficient time to recuperate, and enjoy time with their families. In short, staff will be treated as people, not as mere accounting units.

Comment Re:Ugh.... (Score 4, Interesting) 280

"Using" the cloud and "trusting" the cloud are two distinct concepts. We all are using fiber and copper infrastructure laid down by some telco provider's lowest bidder. Do we trust them? No, disregarding their honesty level, we do not know company, never heard of them and never will. Do we use fruits of their labour? Certainly with some precautions, with protocols that removes most if not all potential problems those can be caused by infrastructure...

The "problem" with cloud is that we usually treat it like server in a DC managed by our own team. Nope they are not. My servers are in Singapore due to historical and legal reasons, a country with laws difficult to follow, a country which, while most people describe as a very beautiful one I have no intentions to visit, I do not like international travel. So if I treat those server like servers run by myself, I am open to some problems.

Comment Re:HAHAHAHAHA (Score 1) 582

While I agree on the general principle that "we have a right to privacy", "private communications"... etc. unfortunately in the very long run since the industrial revolution governments over the world are doing their best to gain codified support of law to spy on their citizenry. I guess it was Zimmermann who wrote something like "during the times US constitution was written all you have to do was to walk down away from your home to avoid your talk to be overheard by somebody you do not like to hear it...". As the technology is advancing, so is the ability of governments to track us.

I am a computer professional (a rare thing in /. these days). So my ability to keep my private communications private is not something that can be taken as a reference to general public. As such I prefer general public to be aware of risks and stay away from illusion of privacy in general products. They should spend some money, time and give some thought to their own privacy instead of assuming they are safe by default, because they are not and never will be in an effort free way.

Comment Re:Ilya Suzdalnitski (Score 1) 782

:) I had a programmer in one of my teams like that. The incident I saw him most happy was when he realised that with Django it is possible to declare a specific field of a record (that was a variable in a model for him...) as an index in the db without meddling with Postgres. Yea, I unfortunately see your point ...

Comment Re:Long live France! (Score 4, Insightful) 782

Although I share the feeling about Stroustrup the problem with him is not OOP but a bad implementation of OOP concepts.

I do not like to claim "I know C", since the time I have started to learn language, around 1987. But let's say I am familiar with certain applications of the language. C++ however is an abomination that made me hate OOP concepts. Java was far away from the metal for most of my use cases, so only after discovering Python, I could get comfortable with OOP.

TFA OTOH is complete and utter BS.

Comment Re:Boiling the Frog with an Occasional Ice Cube (Score 1) 172

Hell, I do not want to rant but I remember another anecdote. Last year I changed my GSM operator, because my old operator changed my plan with a lower cost higher capacity one. Nice isn't it, at the and I was their customer for 20+ years... But that made me to check prices on the market and I switched to a package, in their main competitor with one quarter of the monthly fee of my old operator. Even my business partner, switched five lines they use in their family, after seeing price I get.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...