Sorry, what? I replied to a post of yours. How is this a proper or rational response?
Hundreds of thousands of people without problems and a whole bunch with.
I'm sure you have some research behind that claim? Well, let's just pretend that you actually do for the moment. There are hundreds of millions running the software. If ~0.1% are having troubles, it'll be a big number, but still a minute fraction of the user base.
What I said is really True Gospel, no matter what the fanbois whine about.
"True Gospel"? WTF? And I do hope the moronic "fanboi" remark was rhetorical.
What you said was with Apple, you always have to wait for version x.3. So, let's just think about that for a moment. That means that no one should be running Mountain Lion or iOS 6, because neither have hit x.3. Now, if what you said is true, then you'd expect a majority of users to be having nothing but troubles. Do you think that's even remotely the case?
Yes, there will be bugs, and yes, some people will be hit hard by them. But if it's something that is going to hit such a small percentage of users, is it really "True Gospel"? Sounds more like, "sometimes it's true, but 99.9% of the time it's bullshit". I don't think that's how most people use the word "gospel".
Apple has been pretty bad about software / firmware upgrades for years. 10.0.0 - now exactly how useful was that, remember? 10.6.0 (which was supposed to fix things - glitches galore. 10.7.0 - a mess, 10.8 - still pretty iffy for a lot of people.
Hey, I use OS X (and iOS) daily - I like it. I'm just happy to let the bleeding edge get all white and pasty and act as beta testers. Of course, this isn't exactly restricted to Apple - Google, Microsoft, Oracle (well, they never actually get it together), HP (um, ditto) and everybody else has issues.
So, your Apple rule isn't just an Apple rule after all. But more to the point, it's a silly rule. I can see it being applicable to some people (such as yourself), but by no means is it a "True Gospel" rule for everyone to follow. And it's absurd and offensive to call people "fanbois" because they don't have any problems, or that they need to "get a life" because they point this out to you.
Just don't get all of your panties twisted about.
What are you talking about? You're the one making silly claims of FUD.
It's a tool. Not an altar.
Wait, didn't you just call it "True Gospel"? You're accusing others of being "religious" about it, when you're the only one who has been using religious terminology? You're all over the board here!
It's quite odd to me that you think saying, "most people aren't having any significant problems with the software" makes one a... no-life fanboi, getting his (apparently gay, given your choice of spelling for "fanboy") panties in a twist, at an alter. Or something.
Or maybe you just aren't all that coherent today.