Comment Re:It's not offensive, just childish (Score 1) 395
It's not porn. It's an image of a woman with a bare shoulder. Unless people saw the original image they would never know.
It's not porn. It's an image of a woman with a bare shoulder. Unless people saw the original image they would never know.
It seems the kinds of feminists that only pay lip service to equality are the ones in charge. We never hear them fight for "equality" when it's unpleasant or dangerous. 95% of workplace fatalities are male, but you see today's feminists protesting in the streets for a few percentage points different in gross pay, despite women working less hours by choice. Who's going to narrow the death gap?
No. This won't drag us back to the "dark age of the Internet". There was no "dark age of the Internet" unless one counts what's going on right now.
GMX beat Gmail by over a year. At the time I recall noting that Gmail was stealing their business model and marketing plan. GMX still exists. I prefer it to Gmail.
The real academic crime is the baseless assumption that 50/50 sex representation in STEM is fairness or some form of equality. Men and women can have radically different tastes and preferences, and this heavy handed forcing of "diversity" is an affront to the human right of freedom of choice.
Wow. What an amazing discovery. Women blame men for their life's choices. I'm stunned. What do I get if I blame you?
Why? Seriously? Why?
Why aren't men and women allowed to like different things, and why aren't those things allowed to be different? Where did free will go? Why is there the assumption that equality means 50% female engineers? What if both women and men don't want that? Eventually you will have to force people into careers they don't want to reach a goal that never made sense to begin with.
Men and women are different. They want different things. Demanding 50/50 representation isn't equality, it's the cruellest oppression of human nature.
Invading then sanitizing men's spaces is a well documented female behaviour pattern that pre-dates modernity. It stems from the fear of what men are up to when not under the direct control and influence of their wives. No matter how tame, men interacting with men is seen as a dangerous threat. These days not even video games men enjoy are safe.
Your mistake was giving up on the urge to make people suffer. Change doesn't occur unless you make people uncomfortable.
They clearly like the online-only format because they can just produce it as a movie with a lot of production value, visual effects, etc.
Like you, I prefer the old, live, real, in-person events with some playing of topical videos as long as they are not too many or too long.
various Microsoft tools - such as the setup programs for SQL Server Management Studio - like to lock out the Explorer window
I've not observed that behavior in a long time...and as it happens, Winget is upgrading SSMS as I type this. Everything else continues to work as normal while it does its thing.
Why don't they hook the exhaust up to a water boiler and spin a turbine? Certainly useful power from fusion can't be this easy?
I've met those nutters too. It's sad they can't differentiate science from fiction. The saddest part is that they do have some legit concerns. Geoengineering is a thing. Cloud seeding is a thing. It's OK to not want it in one's state.
I've seen this with past "movements". Moneyed powers would deliberately fund the crazies so that the few legit concerns they have won't get traction. I'm not sure there's any money behind geoengineering, so these guys might just be cranks. Too many conspiracy theories have turned out to be true, so there might be something deeper behind this trend. They seem too organized and funded to only be crazies. Follow the money.
Or Larry Wall of Perl. Was a music and chemsitry major, ultimately did linguistics and language.
I'm also a Liberal Arts major and grad schooler. I was 2 classes shy of an undergrad computer science major (2 prereq math classes I didn't care to take) and I've never felt that has held me back!
I tried OCLP with the latest Sonoma, which worked okay for getting Xcode 15.3 on a 2014 mini. It performed somewhat acceptably after disabling just about every service imaginable
I'm running OCLP on a 2017 imac and it runs about 98% fine. The 2% is that occasionally, like once a month or so it will fail to wake up from sleep. I haven't had to disable anything. I guess ther eare some issues with the old GPUs in the 2014 model? What did you have to disable?
After I realized Apple started forcing the use of their hypervisor
Which hypervisor?
Thus spake the master programmer: "Time for you to leave." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"