Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The Price of Alarmist Politicians (Score 1) 457

Hm.. No. I don't believe this. I do believe that money was never spent on critical projects such as regular and on going maintenance of core infrastructure that California needs to survive. Rather the people of California would rather spend their money on trains between wealthy areas.

Comment Re:Political fallout (Score 1) 457

mostly because no one has been willing to put up the money to pay for it,

Sorry but I recall the Federal government spent nearly a trillion dollars some 8 years ago to correct these issues, most of which ended up in the same pockets as before and very little repair or improvement took place.

Comment Re:The problem was lack of maintenance (Score 1) 457

Yeah, I had read some place that the problems in both spillways where noted by federal inspectors 12 years ago and since then nothing has been done. I remember living there a decade + ago and had graybeard friends that always wondered why they never performed any kind of maintenance on any of the dams in NorCal. The first time Folsom dam was worked on with any serious effort was after one of the primary sluice gates catastrophically failed. So hearing about Oroville is par for the course. California has bigger ticket items to spend money on I guess.

Comment Gentetic modification (Score 4, Insightful) 292

The scientists also believe that the genetic understanding now gained will allow them to breed shorter, stockier plants that don't fall over as easily, and that these benefits could be gained without the use of genetic modification.

I guess plant splicing and selective breading do not count as genetic modification. Who knew? Must have meant direct genetic modification.

Submission + - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules (dailymail.co.uk) 2

turkeydance writes: A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

 

Slashdot Top Deals

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...