Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Unanswered questions (Score 1) 203

How many different characters can you create?

8 to start with, eventually they plan to offer additional character slots for a small fee. However, in-game each character can have multiple costumes that are completely different from your original (even down to changing body size and proportions) so it's not quite as inflexible as the 8-character limit initially seems.

Where do you get the lifetime subscription? (I don't see it on the website.)

AFAIK, the lifetime subscriptions were only offered up until the official release - so unless you participated in the Beta or the "early start" offered to certain pre-order customers, it wasn't really an option.

Is this a game even an 8-year old can enjoy?

There's lots of bang-boom, the controls are fairly simple, an 8-year old that enjoys comics and has the computer skills required to operate the game could enjoy it. I would not let the child play unsupervised, though.

And most importantly, how large can you make the female Champion's breasts?

Quite large, but not disturbingly so. There really isn't any 'boob physics' to speak of, like you'd see in a fighting game. They just sort of poke out there like a pair of bulbous road cones.

I get much more amusement out of making characters that have disproportionate bodies - huge gangly arms with short legs, gigantic melon head, etc.

Comment Re:Bad water... (Score 1) 431

This is so many levels of incorrect I don't even know where to begin.

Let's start with the Clean Water Act. There are numerous failures in compliance, and the EPA acknowledges they are vastly underfunded to provide proper enforcement. Depending on the state, there have been noncompliance rates of as high as 80%, e.g., Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The violators claim that many of these are bureaucratic in nature and don't actually represent a threat to the water supply, but to say that legal measures have adequately protected the US water supply is woefully ignorant of the facts.

Second, "residual chlorine" does not "leach" out of the water. Chlorine does not just magically disappear out of aqueous solution; the atoms are still there--indeed they must be in order for chlorination to be effective!--unless you have found some way to evolve a gas that will bubble out of the water. Leaching refers to the release of a substance out of a solution over time. Once you put chlorine into water, it forms hypochlorite (the same ion found in household bleach), which is the disinfecting agent.

Third, the study already amply documents the growth of the aforementioned bacteria inside the shower head. There is a small amount of standing water that remains in the head; exposure to air then permits the bacteria to grow--even in the presence of any small concentration of chlorine in the water. It doesn't take much for a colony to overpower a little bit of chlorine.

Fourth, there are many species of bacteria that are well adapted to surviving in what we would consider highly toxic environments. It should not come as a surprise that there should exist bacteria that are simultaneously (a) able to flourish in a (poorly-maintained) shower head attached to a municipal water supply, and (b) pathogenic in nature.

Finally, all it takes is to get an all-metal shower head where you can easily detach the nozzle assembly. They sell them at the hardware store--I should know, I bought one recently (my old shower broke). Once a month, you unscrew the nozzle portion, and clean it out. If your water is really crazy hard like mine (seriously wtf, it's got more calcium than milk), you pretty much need to do this anyway because the nozzles get clogged if you don't. But don't buy cheapo plastic shower heads because (1) they break easily, and (2) they seem to clog faster because the nozzles tend to be finer.

Comment Re:HD radio (Score 1) 351

2) HD Radio is higher fidelity than FM, and that's what it's being compared to. ("Definition" doesn't really work with audio, anyway)

Partially True. A station has a set amount of data it can transfer. If a station splits its signal over too many channels (like High-Def's sub-channels), you can get down to a quality that is indeed worse than FM.

Patents

Submission + - Peer Review Starts for Software Patents

perbert writes: As seen in an interview in IEEE Spectrum: Qualcomm v. Broadcom. Amazon v. IBM. Apple v. seemingly everyone. The number of high-profile patent lawsuits in this country has reached a staggering level. Hoping to curtail the orgy of tech-industry litigation, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is experimenting with reforming the way patents are applied for and processed. Launching on 18 June 2007 was an Internet-based peer-review program whereby anyone (yes, even you) can help to evaluate a number of software patent applications voluntarily submitted for public evaluation. The one-year pilot Peer-to-Patent program is a collaboration between the USPTO and New York Law School's Institute for Information Law and Policy, in New York City. The program's Web site allows users to weigh in on patent applications by researching, evaluating, submitting, and discussing prior art, which is any existing information, such as articles in technology journals and other patents, relevant to the applicant's claims.
Patents

Submission + - You Can Peer Review Software Patents (peertopatent.org)

Jerry "Hypnotic" Buehr writes: "The Peer to Patent Project has started, providing a website for public-access community patent review. You can now pitch in and help roll back the tide of ridiculous patents by exploding the bad ones with prior art. There's also an interview on IEEE Spectrum Online with the innovator behind the Peer-to-Patent project, Beth Noveck."
Patents

Submission + - Peer review of patents - will it help? (ieee.org)

billsoxs writes: IEEE spectrum is running a story about a trial run at peer review of patents — particularly those nasty software patents. From the article:

"Qualcomm v. Broadcom. Amazon v. IBM. Apple v. seemingly everyone. The number of high-profile patent lawsuits in this country has reached a staggering level. Hoping to curtail the orgy of tech-industry litigation, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is experimenting with reforming the way patents are applied for and processed. Launching on 18 June 2007 was an Internet-based peer-review program whereby anyone (yes, even you) can help to evaluate a number of software patent applications voluntarily submitted for public evaluation. The one-year pilot Peer-to-Patent program is a collaboration between the USPTO and New York Law School's Institute for Information Law and Policy, in New York City. The program's Web site allows users to weigh in on patent applications by researching, evaluating, submitting, and discussing prior art, which is any existing information, such as articles in technology journals and other patents, relevant to the applicant's claims."

The Media

Submission + - China Overtakes US As Worst CO2 Emitter (guardian.co.uk) 1

cybermage writes: "The Guardian broke the story of a new study that says "China overtakes U.S. as world's biggest CO2 emitter". Does the press have the story right? On a per person basis, the U.S. emits four times the carbon of China. Also, when you consider how much American manufacturing for American consumption is outsourced to China, how can the study be taken at face value?"

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...