First: Please proof your comments, especially when trying to prove someone wrong.
Second: How is he responsible for the actions of the website developers? They could have been using the exploit for a long time. The article just says that a site is using that bug, not that they got the idea from his publishing or even that they just started using the exploit within a week. You have a guy that has published a bug, then you have a site that is said to be exploiting the bug; nothing linking the two.
Because it's new! New == Better
Hasn't Microsoft taught you anything?
LOL j/k
we in America have a functioning democracy and consequently all of the elected officials play on the same team.
Somebody needs to wake up and take a look around
You do know that the old service packs were downloadable as an executable and
which can have its component files extracted
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.