Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:aiding and abetting 8 computer fraud and abuse (Score 1) 404

First: Please proof your comments, especially when trying to prove someone wrong.

Second: How is he responsible for the actions of the website developers? They could have been using the exploit for a long time. The article just says that a site is using that bug, not that they got the idea from his publishing or even that they just started using the exploit within a week. You have a guy that has published a bug, then you have a site that is said to be exploiting the bug; nothing linking the two.

Comment Re:aiding and abetting 8 computer fraud and abuse (Score 2) 404

Ok, good point on the billy-club. If I read correctly, didn't he give MS 4 weeks to patch it before publishing an exploit for the bug? MS is a commercial company that provides a product and has an obligation to ensure its security. The Linux kernel, however, comes with no such guarantees; maybe if you bought a commercial distro but even then it depends on the EULA. You can always speculate better/different ways of doing something after it's done. I'm not going to bash Ormandy for publicizing the bug anymore than I would bash somebody for publicizing a bug in the Linux kernel. Come to think of it, aren't all the bugs for linux (and other opensource projects) public on a bug site?

Slashdot Top Deals

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...