Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:O RLY (Score 2) 340

Yeah, it's not possible they've learned anything about this brand new disease between February and June.

Personally, I was a little suspicious when they were saying, "Masks don't really help prevent the spread of Covid." While also saying, "Healthcare workers have a critical shortage of masks!". If masks weren't effective, then it's not a big problem if healthcare workers can't get them and you wouldn't see doctors wearing them all the time.

All they had to do was be honest from the start and say that masks are effective but are difficult to get, and publish plans to make our own. They probably killed thousands of people and infected 10s of thousands more with their misleading statement.

Comment This doesn't even seem like a difficult problem (Score 1) 355

Off of the top of my head:
  1. 1. Voter logs into System A. System A verifies four things:
    1. a. The person is who they say they are and
    2. b. The person is eligible to vote in the election.
    3. c. The person is a human
    4. d. The person has not voted already
  2. 2. System A issues an authentication token to the person and sends a notification to system B that the holder of this specific token is allowed to vote some specific ballot
  3. 3. Person presents token to System B and system B presents them with the ballot for the elections they are eligible.
  4. 4. Person votes their ballot and reviews their answers
  5. 5. System B informs System A that the holder of that token has voted successfully

Later on there are comparisons made between both system to verify that the number of votes match in both systems. I just don't see how any paper system is going to be more secure than this. If a person is having any problems with the system, they can revert to a mail in ballot or attend in person to vote. At the polls, anyone who already voted electronically is crossed off the list.

Comment I'm not convined (Score 5, Insightful) 401

I'm pretty well sold on the idea that it wasn't manufactured in a lab.
They fail to make a convincing argument that it couldn't have come from a lab where they were researching corona viruses.

That raises the first coincidence that would be needed for SARS-CoV-2 to come out of a laboratory: Scientists would have to find it in nature first.

If it wasn't manufactured in a lab, wouldn't it have to come from nature anyway? This could happen at a market certainly, but someone has to collect and deliver samples to labs and study them, and the ones a lab would want are ones more likely to be infectious.

Even if researchers stumbled across the virus, they would be very unlikely to get infected. When researchers collect samples, they take extraordinary precautions to avoid infecting themselves in the field, says Mazet

Yeah, we take extraordinary precautions to train employees to detect phishing scams and choose decent passwords, yet malware seems to make it on computer networks all of the time. If there's one thing the scientific research world can learn from from the world of computers, it's that any security system built on requiring everyone to voluntarily do even one thing correctly every time is a system that will fail eventually, and the last thing anyone wants to hear out of a person's mouth at that point is, "But we have procedures!".

Now it is possible for viruses to escape from a laboratory by infecting a worker. In the early 2000s, there were three documented cases of the original SARS virus escaping from a laboratory environment, according to Lim Poh Lian, a senior consultant at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases in Singapore. But the circumstances surrounding those escapes were vastly different.

Great. Well first of all since they don't know anything about the circumstances, they don't know how those circumstances could have been different and we know it's possible for it to escape from lab environments. It should be very difficult to spread if proper procedures are followed, but there's no way to prove that the proper procedures were being followed at the lab.

In any event, lab escape still gets a rating of "plausible" even if there's no smoking gun.

Comment Re:How about no to regular updates (Score 2) 87

I'm fed of my computers being rebooted in the middle of the night losing all my work. Windows 10 is not suitable for work that needs to be done over multiple nights. I guess people are too demoralized by the update process to take action against Microsoft.

You could save your work at the end of the night, just a thought.

Do you want to know why Microsoft forces updates on people?

They got really sick of having this conversation:
News:Another Internet worm is going around that exploits a remote vulnerability in Windows
Public:What the fuck Microsoft?!? Get your shit together!
Microsoft:We released a patch for this six months ago! People aren't applying the updates!


Which led to this conversation:
Microsoft:From now on, we will force people to update their systems. If you run professional you can delay it but only for 30 days
Public:What the fuck Microsoft! Forcing me to update my computer! You're friggen Nazis man!

Personally, I prefer the world where Internet worms aren't running rampant

Slashdot Top Deals

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...