Comment Re:FIAF. (Score 2) 212
Better a vet with an encyclopedic knowledge of biochemistry than an anonymous coward.
Better a vet with an encyclopedic knowledge of biochemistry than an anonymous coward.
Will the recipients of her gut bacteria be required to marry Lyle Lovett?
Check his citations. They're proper peer reviewed papers. His conclusions make sense and fit the data.
This is a FIAF thing..
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2007/12/fiaf-whos-fat-is-it-anyway.html
It's not that they're better at extracting nutrients, it's that they influence the body to expend more or less enery. The nutrient extraction is a side effect.
I do wish researchers would read the relevant literature before jumping to conclusions.
Samsung has the mid-range market sewn up
Samsung has the best combination of price-performance and advertising cachet at the moment. This can all easily change; they have nothing to give them a stable lock on the market.
That's like saying almost all sex they've ever had was consensual and legal, so we really shouldn't blame them for the few cases of rape they committed.
>NIST isn't all bad
But it is fairly bad. The numerous 'frameworks' and 'guidelines' lack specificity and a clear certification path, while the many crypto specs are overburdened with buckets of specificity that makes certification onerous.
Part of the problem is that the NIST specs are not created with anything like a normal standards process where there are competing interests watching out for stupid stuff and jumping on it. That's how we ended up with nightmares like the key derivation spec or the inappropriate online tests in SP800-90B or the fixed block size on AES. Anything contributed from the outside had to play be predetermined rules that did not improve the specs.
Or "glass underwear". Take your pick.
Actually its Pant-Y-Gwydr and its more of a restaurant than a place. It translates to "First Post"
The Zombie Hunter? Wow.
They're the original Mormons.
I thought he spent his college years in a love triangle with Vladimir Putin and Linus.
Your right about that.
If it's the only evidence and it's obviously fake, then that supports a fit up hypothesis.
As with the Reiser's of this world, once you've got the guy who actually did it, all sorts of forensic and circumstantial evidence pops up.
I am? I didn't know that. An atheist brought up as a Welsh methodist is really a Mormon? Where do I go to buy my magic underwear?
THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE