Nokia is a 150-year-old storied company. The Finns may not be too keen to let it go to an American firm.
Nokia may be 150 years old, but Microsoft would only want their technological branch. That branch is much younger. The question is who gets the brand name, though.
As a skydiver, I can testify to the fact that you can "impact" a gas:)
In the gentle words of the virgin mary: COME AGAIN?
Easily explained: The actual figure is redshift 8.2, putting it about 13 billion light years away.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only.
Why am I not allowed to view or post in this article?
About sending information back in time...
To paraphrase Fermi,
If this theory is true, why haven't we done so already?
The pilots would have to ignore the PAPI glide slope indicators too. These are rows of light which shine all red when you're coming in too low, a clear warning that you should go around.
And that's even if you ignore the altimeter, 200 meters should be about 20hPa too low on the (in that weather already low) QNH?
And the settlers marsupials?
*ducks*
I think these numbers are from the joint union agreement (fellesavtalen). Your rights as granted by law are a little worse, eg. 40 hour weeks and 140% overtime. Still, very good by international standards.
Absolutely! And it certainly doesn't need to be collected by private organizations either. If a hooligan commits a criminal offense, his data should be collected by the local police.
If a permanent ban from sports is needed, that information should be sent back to the authorities in the perpetrators home country according to international agreement.
For later matches, border control in the hosting country could then request a blacklist from each participating country.
Poor intellectual judgement on his part? It's the accepted term. Just look at
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/home/index.html, and the about 1,430,000 other results just at nasa.gov pages.
I totally agree with you, this is too insubstantial even for science reporting.
The article is at adsabs, but it's on subscription only:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010GeoRL..3714107D
Maybe someone with a subscription to "Geophysical Research Letters" could voice an opinion?
Suggest you just sit there and wait till life gets easier.