because their objections are based on ideology, not science.
From where I sit, it's the people putting arbitrary "corrections" into the programs to make them come out the way they want and refusing to accept any articles that don't toe the party line into their "peer reviewed journals" who look like religious zealots, and the soi-disant "deniers" are the ones who are trying to do things in a proper scientific manner..
Except that the corrections aren't arbitrary, and you don't know what you're talking about.
Do you even know what flux correction or parametrization is?
Despite the fact that spousal abusers are just as likely to be women and that the abused are just as likely to be men
Citation needed.
I fully suspect you are pulling this out of your ass, especially since there are tons of studies directly contradicting you. In fact, you are off by a massive margin; 85% of the victims of relationship violence are women.
Here are some starter links: http://www.abanet.org/domviol/statistics.html
BLISS is ignorance.