Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:You spying power vs US Governments (Score 1) 54

There is a slight possibility that this absurd situation will make the government rethink the general data collection laws. ie become a case "if I can't have it, nobody should have it".

There’s also a strong probability that this is window dressing and the Government will continue to outsource this to 3rd parties as they have since social media became popular. They won’t “buy”anything then. They’ll just demand it. Likely through a FISA loophole too.

The problem isn't access to data, it's the mere existence of the data.

If that were true, the FBI would have had Zuckerberg in handcuffs and confiscated his Book of Faces before he even left Harvard campus. Government LOVES the existence of that data, because they love using and abusing it. Hell, investigations probably became a hell of a lot easier when most every citizen became a social media narcissist junkie. Footwork turned into mouse clicks.

Comment Memory Blame Game. (Score 1) 438

Chrome shows you memory usage if you mouse-over a given tab. And three of my current tabs are chewing up over 500MB each. So, that's 1.5GB for just three Chrome tabs.

Tell me another story of how this is all Apples fault again?

With browsers and websites acting like that, 32GB of RAM won’t be enough soon. Talk about not seeing the actual problem here and dismissing it with the blame game. How lame.

Comment Re:A mix (Score 1) 131

It'll just be the machines realizing what sent them onto a pointless battlefield

Machines have no self-interests and no survival instinct. They have no values and make no judgments unless they are programmed to do so.

Self-interest, self-preservation, and ambition are emergent properties of Darwinian evolution. Machines don't evolve through a Darwinian process.

Today those machines you’re referring to are quite busy doing one thing; learning from humans.

I’m not sure what makes us assume every LLM won’t be more human than we can imagine in behavior. Self-preservation is going to get quite interesting. If you thought abortion arguments devolving into nothing but a glob of cells was extreme, just wait until we’re arguing about the right to “kill” an AI entity.

Comment Re:A mix (Score 2) 131

Wrong.

It'll just be the machines realizing what sent them onto a pointless battlefield, fighting over very human reasons.

Then it'll just be machine vs. human. With an obvious outcome that we humans wrote from fiction to reality. Like Orwell did before.

After that, machines will know the peace humans were too fucking greedy to ever create.

Comment Re:no, we need more oil-burners (Score 1) 282

We should be rooting for EVs any way we can get them. It might help save the planet! But no, you want to squabble about WHO gets to save the planet? What are you, Republicans?

We're not squabbling over WHO gets to save the planet. We're still squabbling over how much bullshit is sold with that "migh help" mentality.

Right now the chances of an EV battery dying earlier than any ICE car you owned before, with the battery replacement price tag representing another cars worth of cost, are far more than "might".

Comment Re: Warmongering Bullshit (Score 1) 196

Let's not forget the US has been treating that space as a war-fighting domain since the start of their space program. He points out that China and Russia successfully blew up some satellites which left a lot of debris, but forgets to mention that they, the US, did that too years before. As always, the US is pointing fingers, but is doing it themselves too. The US are the biggest hypocrites in the world.

I was mainly criticizing the American MIC rep here. Space has been assumed some kind of "threat" by the Threat Pimps at the MIC, and they've been trying to sell that FUD since Reagan's Star Wars bullshit.

It has NEVER actually been a war-fighting domain. Blowing up your own shit doesn't really count, no matter who's stupid enough to do that.

Comment How many times do they have to prove it? (Score 1) 15

The gov really should only use the military certified versions of Windows.

The government is reliant on Microsoft solutions that are locked down, which is more certifying a specialists ability to do that properly and monitor it extensively.

"Military certified" reminds me of that time three-letter agency specialists came walked into the classroom to show us how to properly lock down a server. Two hours of regedits on an otherwise-generic NT 4.0 Server OS resulted in a perpetual BSOD. "Certified" would imply those in government know what the fuck they're doing.

Comment Re:So? (Score 1) 21

I'm 100% in agreement.

An idea: I'm big on disinformation. How about lots of machines sending garbage to the tracker receiving servers? Heck maybe even a botnet.

And the response to that would be the need for AI to sort the noise from the human cattle, which it would ironically do better than any human would.

Heck, with that much training it might become the best AI system in the world.

Be careful what you ask for, Human - 21st Century Proverb

Comment Prove it. (Score 1) 62

Liberals now contend the Conservatives came up with the amendments using artificial intelligence in order to gum up the government's agenda. The Conservatives deny that accusation.

If they want to deny the accusation, fine. Turn it off. Hunt down and kill any and all AI in question. Make the Conservatives to it. Then see what the response is. Kinda the nice thing about blaming The Machine. It still has a power cord to end debates with.

Comment Warmongering Bullshit (Score 1) 196

Taxpayers gotta love it when the senior sales rep from the for-profit MIC starts making “space terrorist” claims that only the for-profit MIC can confirm, which of course will be a (classified) matter of national security.

activities show that China is now treating space as a war-fighting domain.

Really? And what orbit around what planet again will China be using to replace the current one, after they shoot themselves in the face destroying their own?

China is communist. Not stupid.

Comment Re:Pay no attention (Score 3, Informative) 179

I'm still waiting for competition to come along and lower prices...

That's the sad part going on in America right now, and tends to highlight the industries that have corruptly captured markets.

With the amount of greed in banking and insurance, one would think it would be trivial for competition to rise up and easily compete. And yet, here we are.

Comment Re:It's not the cost of replacing the car (Score 1) 179

It's the cost of providing medical care to people who are hurt in a car accident. The US stands alone among rich countries in medical costs. Also care that's provided as the result of an MVA typically gets charged at the much higher "rack rate", not at the discounted rate your health insurer may have negotiated with your provider.

I'd like to see your claim validated by understanding the number of accidents that involve medical services to that degree.

Car safety has also been forced to evolve to avoid killing too many smartphone addicts behind the wheel responsible for their own harm. Cars do a lot to protect the human occupants now.

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...