Comment Re: New law via AI (Score 1) 27
Who do you believe? Actually that's a joke, you don't have to believe either one of them.
The *gpt seems to do a pretty good job at taking a list and turning into prose; and ones with few grammatical or typographical deficiencies at that.
Not brief prose.
When Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing's own money, Boeing's tried-and-true leadership bailed out and Douglas' incapable, inept
Note that they weren't inept, they were inept at building airplanes. They were good at office politics. These things go hand-in-hand.
Everyone who scrolls through travelocity.com to find a flight that is $0.01 cheaper.
I'm sorry, I missed the option to click for "plane that doesn't fall apart." Can you tell me where it is in the UI?
If only the summary and the article hadn't contained the statement, from Google, that "Google developed its processors 'independently over many years.'"
Google lies, has lied, and will continue to lie in the future.
But under patent law, it wouldn't matter.
Yeap, all that matters is whether Google is infringing on a valid patent.
If they ripped off another company's ideas, that's just Google being evil, not illegal.
Apparently, I've been infringing on Google's patents before they ever became a company.
How, exactly?
By "global economy" they mean the West. The BRICS nations are doing gangbusters.
If you're going to talk about things, you should do a quick search to make sure you're ignorant. See for example the economy of Brazil.
all the world's easily accessible resources and food, etc.
Are you saying Europe and the US don't grow food?
It's not that they're getting good, I mean they are but it's not that. Unity has shown it's not safe to use.
People were motivated to look for alternatives, found them, and are not going back.
"Been through Hell? Whaddya bring back for me?" -- A. Brilliant