306613
submission
Bearhouse writes:
As widely predicted, it's now being reported by the BBC, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7017660.stm, and the NYT, http://tinyurl.com/25sgxe, that upgrading your unlocked iPhone is not good news. Anybody surprised?
Following on from earlier posts here about the legality of unlocking your iPhone, what's your opinion on the legality of Apple bricking it for you with an upgrade? Do you think this is a bad way for Apple to build customer loyalty with an increasingly tech-savy user base, who like to add applications to their personal devices? Or do you think it's good, bearing in mind that mobile phones are being hyped as the next payment method, and so need to be secure?
302593
submission
Bearhouse writes:
One of my clients, a major international, wants to get control over its email. IT support is outsourced, and poor.
At the moment, they've launched a small project to deal with 'excessive' volumes of mails — some people receive over 300 per day!
Although many of the users are engineers, they typically are not well-trained in Notes, and do not tend to use its advanced features.
The in-house team they've put together has come up with suggestions like, "let's force people to click on confirmation dialogs when they hit 'reply to all', or have big attachments". I'm not sure this is the way to go. Anybody here have any ideas to help, please?
Also, what tools would readers suggest to structure and 'mine' the vast quantity of mails that are generated each year?
At the moment, this information goes totally unused...
243823
submission
Bearhouse writes:
Picked this up via doggdot, so sorry if dupe. Anyways, there's been some discussion here about Automatix, with some liking it, and others (predictably) not. Interesting — if rather brief — critique here:
http://mjg59.livejournal.com/77440.html
So, do people agree? What are the better alternatives?
222845
submission
Bearhouse writes:
ars technica reports that the planned tripling of royalties for US-based net radios may be postponed, but at a price. From the article, "SoundExchange has offered to cap the $500 per channel minimum fee at $50,000 per year for webcasters who agree to provide more detailed reporting of the music that they play and work to stop users from engaging in 'streamripping' — turning Internet radio performances into a digital music library,". Could this mean a return to 'pirate radio', with sites moving offshore?
181539
submission
Bearhouse writes:
The folks over at Wired publish the results of surveying some popular US-based ISPs. The results are patchy. Some ISPs only responded to a few questions, and others not at all. Of those that did respond, some keep record of IPs allocated, and URLs visited, for up to six months. Seems a tempting target for both black hats and law enforcers. Who'll get your browsing history first?
Read more at http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/20 07/05/isp_privacy
170995
submission
Bearhouse writes:
The original report, regarding the loss of the ashes of the late Star Trek actor James Doohan, (Scotty), got a lot of press here.
Well, the BBC is reporting that they've been found, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6671887.s tm
From the article, 'before his death — at the age of 85 — two years ago, he had asked for his remains to be sent into space....Wende Doohan, James Doohan's widow, told the Associated Press news agency her late husband "probably wished he could have stayed".'
How long before we have the option of being 'buried in space'? Would you advocate / go for it?
139665
submission
Bearhouse writes:
The BBC reports, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6574175.stm, that Google has seen quarterly profits soar by 69%, boosted by strong advertising revenue. From the article, "[Google] net income climbed to $1bn (£499m) in the first three months of 2007, up from $592m on a year earlier. Google's results contrast sharply with Yahoo, whose sales fell 11% in the first three months of this year.
Yahoo's net profit fell to $142m (£71m) for the three months to March 31, compared with $160m a year earlier." Looks like the ultimate 'geeks' are also winning out on the commercial front. Are the 'don't be evil boys' going to challenge the 'evil empire' with, among other things, Google apps? Having crushed the other search apps, and bought out DoubleClick, what's next?
134701
submission
Bearhouse writes:
From the NYT today, "Microsoft, a veteran defendant of epic antitrust battles in the United States and Europe, is urging regulators to consider scuttling Google's plan to buy DoubleClick, an online advertising company." and
"We think antitrust authorities should take a hard look at this deal and the implications," said Jim Cicconi, senior executive vice president for external affairs at AT&T. "If any one company gets a hammerlock on the online advertising space, as Google seems to be trying to do, that is worrisome."
See: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/technology/16sof t.html?ref=technology
Sour grapes, or a legit concern?
98322
submission
Bearhouse writes:
From PC mag, (so get used to clicking 'next' — ugh). Not for Mac & **x fanboys.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2090787,00.as p
OK, lots of 'usual suspects', and power geeks will not be impressed by the security stuff, but they are better than nothing, and reasonable choices. Let's not forget that plenty of otherwise intelligent people have nothing..
Last time I went to a dentist, for example, she had *no* anti-virus software installed. *sigh*
(Upside! Traded my treatment for re-installing everything...stopping counting trojans & viruses after 200..)
More interestingly, there's some of my favorites in the article, (Irfanview), plus some stuff that looks interesting.
A good way to get out of free support for your family & friends — just point 'em here.
But note, the PCMag boys picked up a trojan along the way...
96980
submission
Bearhouse writes:
Looks like Apple & Cisco have finally decided to settle, perhaps in the light of the weaknesses in their repective cases, (widely discussed on /.
The NYT article, here, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/22/technology/22app le.html, states "In addition, the companies said they would explore ways to make their identically named iPhone products work together "in the areas of security and consumer and enterprise communication." and "Representatives for Apple and Cisco said other terms of the deal would remain confidential."
Predictions for what this means, if anything?
Also, this looks like an extension of the patent and cybersquatting wars, where organisations register patents or domains simply as bargaining chips.
What should the open source community be patenting and registering? iMail? gPod?
94940
submission
Bearhouse writes:
See http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37 701
The article's a little shrill, but the news is good.
Also http://www.slysoft.com/en/anydvdhd.html
Should get the anti-DRM boys going...
94938
submission
Bearhouse writes:
Many places are reporting that MS's Steve Ballmer is 'blaming poor Vista sales on piracy'...
This seems to be one of the sources (http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php/id;7680622;fp; 16;fpid;1)
From the article, it seems that's not quite what he said. FTA "We have new technologies built into Windows Vista, something we call Windows Genuine Advantage [that] we've really dialed up in capabilities with the Vista release," he said. "I do think that will bring some revenue growth."
and
"Last fall, when Microsoft announced details of Windows Genuine Advantage in Vista — which included new counterfeit-sniffing software as well as the crippling or disabling of important features....the company took heat from both users and analysts."
and
We [will] really ferret through how far we can dial it up, and what that means for customer experience and customer satisfaction,"
Balmer also said that (outside analyst's) sales forecasts for Vista had been 'over optimistic'.
So what's the real story here? Is poor takeup of Vista due to little added value and high resource consumption / patchy driver support or is it piracy? Will 'enhanced' WGA increase exiting concerns about upgrading and recovering Vista? Most important, what do people think about MS 'disabling' security features on 'pirate' software, especially in the light of recent posts about S. Korea and China being the source of many attacks? (High rate of piracy = high rate of malware)
88678
submission
Bearhouse writes:
BBC news reports that Microsoft will be 'supporting' Open ID
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6339813.stm
From the article:
"The Open ID scheme uses web addresses that people already own to help authenticate their identity.
As part of the deal Microsoft is sharing some of its technology with Open ID developers and will include it in future identity-related products."
and
"Microsoft has got involved to supply a technology it is developing called InfoCards to add more flexibility to the scheme."
More on OpenID here:
http://openid.net/specs.bml
One wonders:
1. How secure is this really?
2. Based on experience with Microsoft's 'passport', what will InfoCards bring to the party?
At the end of the article:
"Microsoft has committed to putting Open ID technology into future identity servers but it is not yet clear how this will affect existing sign-on systems for MSN or Hotmail."
3. Well, perhaps the Zune give a clue here.
