Comment Re:Demographics to the rescue!? (Score 1) 63
That bad? Well, they seem to be a society even farther advanced in Enshittification than most of the West.
That bad? Well, they seem to be a society even farther advanced in Enshittification than most of the West.
Indeed, it does. Although not all tech sucks. Often you find some graybeards behind tech that does not suck or at least sucks less though.
CGI and C++? I do you one better. Apparently, if I was interested (currently not) my ex-boss knows people that are really looking for engineers that can handle Fortran competently and the pay seems to be pretty good. Once you are actually an engineer and not a mere technician anymore, the language matters not a lot, what you do with it matters. And none of the youngsters have even heard of things like Fortran, which is actually a pretty decent language.
There is no shortage of work because thereâ(TM)s no shortage of mistakes. Ageism is a thing for meat grinder roles, absolutely. When $ matters youâ(TM)d be surprised how fast the grey hair turns into an asset, not a liability.
True that. Of course, there are a lot of "meat grinder" roles (love that term!) and not so many roles for senior experts. But here is the thing: There are _never_ enough experts (let alone senior ones) and, yes, there is indeed no shortage of mistakes.
I see the same thing. And I see that what MS has built is a crumbly house-of-cards (see recent attacks). Competitors are a bit better, but still, the cloud is a massive single-point-of-failure. Solid and resilient engineering looks different. Less tech diversity is also a big problem. It means more mono-cultures and these are easy to attack and very hard to replace. Again, solid and resilient engineering looks different.
I guess we will need to have a global IT problem that makes Covid like a small thing for people to wake up. It is getting easier and easier to cause that and, at some point, some deranged group (of which there are many) will manage to do it.
They still have people at hand who can make sense of that code.
I can't remember if it was in the book, the movie, or both, but there is a great scene in Andy Weir's "The Martian" where NASA tries to find people who know how the Mars Pathfinder comms work after Mark Watney retrieves it and powers it back up to phone home 38 years after it first touched down on the Red Planet.
While true, you also have a moral responsibility from your choice of who to work for. The typical expectation is that if you do not agree with what your employer does, you first try to change culture there (by legal means, obviously), but then you leave. This is not a one-person-one-vote system, personal merit does count.
While I follow your argument, I do not think that is how it works. The main limiter is not model size, but training data set availability. If you want a different model "bias", you have to find a training data set in the same size that has this different bias. And you cannot use automatically generated data to skew the model. It has to be human-generated input or model collapse may well happen.
It is also pretty stupid with regard to resilience to rely on central infrastructure. Especially MS infrastructure which is known to be massively insecure.
Just so I know who to side with here, what marginalized group are we talking about? The Palestinians who get mowed down by the Israel army or the Jews that get blown to pieces by Hamas?
Both. They're both victims of the governments of those two nations/regions. Hamas's barbarism is entirely inexcusable, but at the same time, the leaders of Israel (and Netanyahu specifically) turned their country hard to the right in a manner that pretty much gave rise to Hamas's power. Foreign governments have also added fuel to the fire, which doesn't help.
The tragedy in this whole farce is that the ones that could make peace don't want it and the ones that would want peace can't make it.
The tragedy is that nobody actually wants peace enough to make it happen. All it would take is the U.N. declaring all of Israel to be a demilitarized zone, ordering the Israeli government and Hamas to both disarm, shooting anyone who refuses to comply, and then keeping those million or so troops in that region to help rebuild, slowly drawing down the number of troops over... say 200 years, so that by the time they are gone, no one alive still remembers the horrors of this day.
Username checks out.
No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.