I expect they're going to follow this up with a "pre-crime" (ala "Minority Report") initiative. They'll monitor people's actions, manners, and postures in the store and learn to anticipate when somebody intends to steal. Then they'll arrest them before the crime is committed and build a case based on "the intention to steal."
It strikes me as though there is a large number of oral medications and injectables all geared toward "managing" diabetes. That's a lot of revenue for somebody. Now to have something that (if it's true) can reduce the need for diabetic medications seems like it would make those drug manufacturers very unhappy.
I wonder how FMC feels about a Chinese company using its name.
I think that's a valid concern although I don't see results as dire as what you're describing.
My impression is funds that invest in energy products/services are beginning to diversify into renewables. These people spend their days watching the markets in an attempt to anticipate changes. And I think the drop in demand for oil will be gradual; not sudden.
But I do agree re fossil fuels; esp. oil. Oil has been a world-wide exchange medium for several decades, but that is about to change. Coal, IMO, is on its way out. I just reviewed a potential investment (energy sector) where the group was clearly moving out of coal since more and more energy producers (aka utilities) are switching plants to gas. These utilities also seem to be looking at blending renewables into their grids.
And I know there are plants that are going to use coal, but I think those are meant more for PR than any actual trend.
So, again IMHO, anyone invested heavily in fossil fuels should be watching the markets.
Because the purpose of the “Philip Cross” operation is systematically to attack and undermine the reputations of those who are prominent in challenging the dominant corporate and state media narrative. particularly in foreign affairs. “Philip Cross” also systematically seeks to burnish the reputations of mainstream media journalists and other figures who are particularly prominent in pushing neo-con propaganda and in promoting the interests of Israel.
Looks like Philip Cross has Jimmy Wales's support.
Thank you for contacting the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC). After investigation we have determined this does not meet the bar. Success of this attack is predicated on a compromised session by having the auth cookie and the session ID cannot be brute forced. As such, this email thread has been closed and will no longer be monitored.
Maybe that's why they tell you to close your browser...
So do you not believe that this is the cause of colony collapse or do you not think that a huge decline in pollinators is a problem?
It seems like we'll soon be getting a reasonably definitive answer on that first question. If colonies rebound after the ban, then that's a pretty good indicator of causality. Likewise, if no rebound occurs over a period of time, such that persistent contamination is ruled out, then that also is an indicator that there may be something else at play.
Exactly! Where are my mod points when I need them? Thank you for a well-reasoned, insightful response. You made the most rational point without belittling or insulting anyone. I almost never see this anymore. You made my day.
One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis
