Comment Re:Actions are all that matters (Score 1) 328
You do have it. I didn't explain it right. Local loop unbundling (LLU) is the idea that the company that controls the infrastructure cannot serve as a last-mile provider. One company lays down the fiber and leases it to someone else to run a service on.
It is perfectly technically feasible in the US. It's all just fucking politics because lobbying -- sorry, bribery -- is a huge thing (that, I assure you, most of the sane people utterly despise) that sways politicians because of fat fucking checks. (I shit you not, a large donor to the US Republican party literally said "pass this tax bill or we stop donating" during that tax bill fiasco that was in the US news late last year.) As I said, we had this concept back when the Internet was made up mostly of dial-up. Big phone companies here like AT&T and Verizon handled the phone systems and ISPs like America Online or Planet Pooch (a personal favorite) handled the "service" end of it.
This is the same country where, when Net Neutrality first popped up and LLU became a topic for a bit, some asshole companies said "that doesn't work for the US market". Of course it doesn't. You may lose some profit, you shitlord.
Two fuckups happened as the reign of dial-up ended. One, Internet over cable started to become a thing and the US law handling dial-up did not apply to cable. Fuck you, Bill Clinton, I believe. Two, companies lobbied -- bribed -- hard to keep it that way. Companies bought other companies. Basically colluded to stay out of each other's markets. (I ask you, how in all the fuck of the world does Comcast get to be San Francisco's only ISP and Verizon, basically, is New York City's only ISP? Both residential. I don't know if you've been to NYC but it's a big fucking market. Someone has to want a piece of that.)
The ISPs in the US fight hard to keep status quo, with:
* ISPs trying to shut down states' rights to create municipal providers (this is fucking outrageous in some cases)
* Fucking with laws to prevent pole access in areas where wires are still on top of poles
* Suing for some inane reason just to make it difficult to move in.
The only point I will concede to these shitstains is that the US is a large country with a lot of dead space and serving people up in mountains, for example, is a technical and fiscal challenge. You won't get a lot of profit serving so many people under X square miles. Ok. Let the government help out. And they do take government money meant for this kind of thing -- and fucking pocket it. New York City, if I remember right, is still involved in a lawsuit with Verizon for fucking them. Verizon disagrees. Assholes.
Count the number of curses in this statement and you'll understand the ire I have for the political party in the US largely responsible for this mess. It comes down to the power companies have over the US government, a term you may or may not be familiar with: regulatory capture. (Democrats aren't innocent but less to blame.)
(I've left out specific law names and program names because I forget the exact naming but I assure you if you were to research this you'll find real world examples of everything, sometimes multiple instances. I'm pulling articles from memory in the last 5-10 years.)