Comment Re:Wow... (Score 4, Funny) 197
Yes but you've now seen the ! so it's NOT admin, we'll have to keep looking.
Those HP guys are clever.
Yes but you've now seen the ! so it's NOT admin, we'll have to keep looking.
Those HP guys are clever.
Yea but you're talking about speech either way, and the first amendment applies to every level from the top on down.
There are millions of people angry about other laws, they aren't all filing lawsuits to challenge them.
This country (USA) needs to learn how to accept points of view that are different and find a common ground. This is why nothing gets done in Congress. No one can stop bickering and being intolernat long enough to do some damn work. That's not what we sent them there to do.
Another nice thought, but one that doesn't work in practice when one side is accusing the other of being agents of the chinese government, or admirers of Stalin and Hitler.
Some laws receive no challenges because no one is sufficiently upset about them.
That's the thing, it seems the only laws that get challenged are the ones that get certain groups of people pissed off. It doesn't mean there aren't sufficient numbers of people pissed off about other laws, but those other people seem to vote and contact representatives rather than stockpile weapons and pretend the country is turning into a communist regime.
I vote. I have written to my representatives.
What would you like me to do?
True, but the flaming crazies on the other side of the fence challenge the other half of things.
It all balances out.
No it doesn't, that was the point of what i said.
The supreme court is the one who set the "miller test", as far as i know that still stands.
That's a nice thought, but they aren't challenging "every little thing" the government does, they only challenge things they don't like, and there aren't a similar number of "flaming crazies" challenging other laws that other americans view as blatantly unconstitutional or imposing on freedom.
Take "obscenity" laws for instance, blatantly unconstitutional and yet those who oppose such laws aren't running around the streets casually with semi-automatic weapons or making references to "2nd amendment remedies" when things don't go their way.
If this were a case about a law requiring everyone to purchase a Bible, these same people would be actively supporting the law or at least remaining silent, because that's what they do, they only run their mouths and cry about freedom when it suits their personal causes.
We know all about it, doing something with that information is another issue.
Referring to this from the chrome os architecture pages
If verification fails, the user can either bypass checking or boot to a safe recovery mode.
That's the step where the system checks it's integrity. Google has said all along that users would not be forced out of their own devices by overzealous security measures.
http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/security-overview
MORE closed? No, because Google has always said that users could get into the core os if they wanted to without resorting to exploits and hacking.
Know how to get those type out of your way? Mention that the place is out of meatball subs, but you've got a special one just for her.
Also a good way to get arrested, so weigh your options carefully.
What the fuck is this comment? I expected at least THREE separate blatant stereotypes, a racial slur and some kind of reference to Apple users being gay. Go back and try again.
-iPhone 4 owner
If I said my penis was 5,000 flagoogles long, it might *sound* impressive, but maybe a hundred flagoogles is only half of a nord?
Isn't a flagoogle a unit of time and not distance?
If your penis was a car, would it be an 18 wheeler or a hatchback? Please phrase your answer in a way that would make Alex Trebek's ears flutter in glee.
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!
