GP poster again.

If you need to really fill PDF forms in Linux, I'd suggest using this PDF X-Change through Wine:
http://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-lite

It is not ideal and crashes at time, but it gets the job done.

(I have no affiliation to this company, I just use their software)

Not quite. Okular is merely fooling you into thinking it can do that.

Okular will add some *Okular specific* metadata to PDFs, and will display that as annotations and text, but all of that will **not** be saved as a standard PDF info. So if you send said PDF to your lawyer per email and the lawyer opens it using, say, Adobe Acrobat they comments and filled information will NOT show up.

http://armbrust.blogspot.fr/2010/02/do-not-use-okular-to-fill-out-pdf-forms.html
http://okular.kde.org/faq.php#addedannotationsinpdf

> But why would one NEED Word? I have yet to see a Word document that Oo wouldn't open easily and render well, despite MS's efforts to thwart them.

People need Word in the same way other people need Emacs or Vim. It is their preferred tool for the job.

> I can't agree; is there a Windows media player that will fetch the lyrics of a playing song and display them? If so I haven't found it.

Honestly, do you really like that? That is somehow a sore point for me because I used to love Amarok, until version 1.3, after that they rewrote everything -in order to include stuff like lyrics search- at IMO detriment of being a good music player. (perhaps it got better... its been years since I last used Amarok...)

I'd say that most users definition of better is to be able to run the applications they want. It has nothing to do with workflow or interfaces. I think what the GP poster was about was not about a desktop's workflow but the whole `does it have the applications that users need/want to use`?

Something that seems lost to all FOSS desktop developers: the actual purpose of the OS + desktop environment is to just run applications. People really don't care about interfaces, or what happens when you type alt-bla. Really. They need Photoshop, Word, Steam, iTunes and they also need the printer/scanner to work when needed.

And just like Emacs won't cut it for VI users (and vice-versa) OpenOffice/Gimp/Etc won't do it.

Actually I use PDF X-Change through Wine (no affiliation, I am just a happy user). When it works, it works great. Sometimes Wine fails on me and it crashes. I would be ok, if I was filling some silly forms, but when I am filling forms to send to a lawyer, I appreciate NOT being annoyed/distracted by Wine crashes.

I don't think it would be hard to find these for Windows, but I reckon that a working app store with some-even-though-imperfect-malware-filtering makes buying software a lot safer and easier. Pretty much like how I never worried about buying used books from 20 random sellers through Amazon, only one reputable firm gets hold of my credit card number and there is a system in place to prevent wide-spread fraud.

IMHO Most people could care less about a desktop's work flow. If it works in *some way* you learn that and get over it. The reason people have computers is to run programs in it.

For one, loads of people need MS Word. Not OpenOffice (or whatever is the new name for it). My sister (pro-photograph) needs Photoshop, not the fscking Gimp. You can argue they /truly need/ it. But one way or another, why should they run an OS that lacks they prefered applications, when they run one that has?

If Linux doesn't have the programs you need or programs which are `good enough for your needs`, and Windows7 or OSX have them. Linux has great browsers, but great applications are really far and few in between.

Some 10 years ago, the Linux desktop was The Challenger. The first alternative to Microsoft. The cool OS to use for all the cool tech headed people. All people I knew working in academic research in 'hard science' fields used Linux.

That moment is gone.

All the younger cool tech-headed kids I know use Macs. Most people that I know that used Linux in the late 90's early 2000 years have migrated to Mac computers. Actually I can say that with one or two exceptions everyone migrated to Macs.

[...]

Personal annecdote:

Started using Linux in 1995. Worked as a Linux sysadmin when I was a student. Use Android phones and installed OpenWrt in my router (previous one ran Tomato). Own a Linux NAS (Debian based). I have a LWN.net subscription. My work computer runs RHEL. My parents computer (I bought it and maintain it), runs Ubuntu.

When my wife needed a new laptop, I bought her a MacBook Air. Not a chance I would inflict Gnome/KDE/Whatever on her.

I have a kid, little spare time and a fair amount of disposable income.

With the Linux desktop:
- Do I have a polished, easy to use, easily discoverable video editor? No.
- Polished, high quality photographic manager and processor for Linux (Like say, Adobe Lightroom)? No.
- Something easy to use for creating good looking family photo albums for printing? No.
- Decent priced PDF editor for filling in PDF files? No. (sorry, I am not buying Acrobat for that).
- Does my kick-ass Lenovo work laptop running certified RHEL has the fan on at all times? Yes.

If I went out of my way to find sort-of-good-enough alternatives for these things, could I do it? Probably.

Do I want to spend my time doing that? No.

The question on my mind right now, is which configuration of the new Retina MacBook Pro to order.

> I would like to see how that sub-$500 laptop is doing after 4 years...my bet is you'd probably need to retrieve it from a landfill first.

Get real.

I have a 7 yr old *consumer* Dell laptop, it does the job for email, web browsing, and ssh.

Look, I have no trouble with people being happy buying 'brand name' whatever. Unless you get a faulty item, if you take minimum care of your Apple / Thinkpad laptop, it will probably last you many years. Just don't delude yourself thinking that the same is also not true of a, say, consumer-level Dell laptop.

> I don't see why people are hung up on a dongle. You have to have a cable, so what's the deal with a dongle being an issue?

Because it is "yet another item to carry along and to keep track of". Some people like to say "less is more" :-P

Oh there is already an ethernet cable. So why not 2 cables (or 3)? One cable is less complex than two.

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.

I used KDE until the 4.0 train wreck. Then I learned that KDE devs didn't care 2 shits about their users. So I took my stuff and went to play elsewhere.

Trying it again? Sorry, KDE fanboys. I actually have work to do and a life to live. In other words, I have better things to do than to be constantly trying new desktops for the sake of trying.

FYI:
- Running Gnome something on the "Red Hat Enterprise Bla" work laptop (yes, my employer actually gives me a Lenovo laptop running RHEL to work on);
- Running Ubuntu+LXDE on my old private laptop;
- Running "Ubuntu" on my private desktop.

I moved a lot in recent years. Will move again in 3 years time (has to do with the job). Turning all that paper weight and volume into digital files and the adjustable font sizes are the real killer e-reader features. Instant dictionary look-ups when reading a foreign language also a huge bonus, although I reckon there is less people that benefits from that.

I think there are a lot of digital hoarders. Just like the people who just hoarded mp3/porn/videos in their computers, now some do that with books as well.

I believe most of those downloaders were not going to be customers anyway.

You clearly never studied math at university level. Proofs can be written in different ways, some easier some harder to read. The choice of which theorems to include and which to leave out also means a lot. Having good exercises lists is also part of being a good book. Sometimes, some math techniques lose relative importance, because their applications lose relative importance.

Also, in older books it was prohibitively expensive to include many figures or graphs. Equations were also expensive to typeset, so older books have less equations. Even the choice of how to write equations was different (as typesetting a large fraction of many variables was much more expensive than just doing "alpha^2 beta bla bla * / ( \int_{x=0}^{1000} gamma bla bla bla)" on a single line of text.

When I was in university, I used books written by the professor teaching the course itself. That happened with 3 different professors.

One of them would let us have the .PS file of his book and print it out ourselves (actually, many of us had access to his LaTeX files). A second required us to buy his book or check it out of the library. The third guy was a very senior man, who had already been legally retired but couldn't care less and still taught all sorts of Analysis courses (mostly functional analysis). Many of his books were not in print anymore, but regardless of being in print or not (he still owned the copyright to all of them) and had clear instructions on the university copy shop that anyone at anytime could make a copy of them.

Not all scientific authors are like (Oxford's?) Atkins ("Physical Chemistry") who made a small fortune selling textbooks.

> Apple can try what it wants but if anyone makes a simple complaint, Apple is going to lose. Even this new thing is meaningless. In Europe, you got two years warranty at least. Take Apple to court, you will win since the law leaves no room for interpretation.

Some people prefer not having to take a seller to court in order to have the law honored. Most people do not have the time nor the inclination to bring a random seller to court. So this matters because it settles the record straight for all consumers without any of them having to bother much (other than paying for the taxes that bring both the law and its enforcement).

Perhaps if you are a lawyer or has lawyers as close friends of family, "taking someone to court" is going to be easy, but it sure as hell not as trivial as "coming back to the shop where product was bought and handling in (without any arguing) for repair".