That should be SPHERESs then.

To say that 0.999... = 1 is undeniably the case is just not true.

It's quite possible to define a number system that has numbers separated by an infinitely small gap just as much as you can have numbers so large they can only be expressed as bigger than all numbers of a set. It's still maths and it still produces true statements.

Maths will only ever churn out true statements based on the assumptions you make, it's your philosophy that will tell you what assumptions are meaningful.

...if they'd imagined it 23 years earlier.

These values are measures for the quality of the air surrounding the huge weather balloon. The weather balloon is huge and it glows. The huge glowing weather balloon was made by students at Carnegie Mellon University...

You're repeating yourself. You said that already. You're just saying the same thing over and over.

So there is in fact no option 3?

This poll is a travesty!

Not sure why but I find the thought of a loads of little boosters gliding into base kind of funny. Why is it that weapon delivery systems can be cute too?

0:40-54 Why does he say speed and energy have a cubic relationship? Kinetic energy is proportional to velocity SQUARED which is a lot less than cubic. So 10 times speed is 100 times energy not 1000. Also it's more likely to LOSE energy at greater speeds so it's likely to be even less than that.

They really need to stop using thier gene sequencers to search for porn.

Does that mean it has a better acceleration or just that the track's long enough for it to keep at maximum speed for more of the journey?

...so of course he's innocent.

What if he intentionally contracted this 'malware'? It seems to do a good job of diverting the blame.

...only this one sucks in light!!!

If the mission were to provide a big target in the sky, they wouldn't have it 20,000 feet in the air.

From the article:
.
U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien said afterward that he had no regrets.
.
"I'm proud of this case...and this team (of prosecutors)," he said, even though using the CFAA to prosecute Drew "was a risk." He added that his office "will always take risks on behalf of children."
.
Taking risks on the behalf of someone is very noble... so long as it isn't them you're putting at risk.