RTFA and find out more about your "argument".

Now, there's plenty of automatic algorithms that already improve this in popular videoprojectors and TV sets, but I haven't experienced it first hand so I can't vouch for it.

Be glad you haven't seen that yet. Those "upscale" (for the lack of a better word for it) algorithms make the picture look absolutely horrible, much like a cheaply produced VHS Porno. Now, there's nothing wrong with pr0n, but I'm not especially a fan of the cheap 80s porn esthetic. I'd rather scratch my eyes out than watching a complete movie that way.

But there's one result that sticks out. The Arch wiki [archlinux.org] provides a nicely organized richly linked list of things you might want to configure, and how to configure them. This is how you collect and present useful information. I figured, if I find myself consistantly using the documentation for a distro, maybe I should check out the actual distro.

That's what happens to me a lot, too, lately. Previously it used to be the Ubuntu Forums where you could find a lot of useful information, but nowadays it's the ArchLinux Wiki that sticks out a lot in search results. May give it a try in a VM soon.

Why didn't you link to Wikipedia? It's explained much better there, IMHO.

Modded you down personally as "overrated" on said Firefox post, I still remember that I thought that your writing made it clear that you lack the technical skills to judge what you wrote about. I still remember that I wanted to write an answer to your post, but that would've undone all my previous moderation. What you posted *was* highly overrated, IMHO, so I rather modded you down instead of correcting you. Not everybody is out there to get you. You seem to be pretty vocal, though, looks like it's pretty easy to get annoyed by your posts. Don't take that as an offence, just as an outside observation.

[...] (no, I'm not calling "Bild" a newspaper. Compared to it, even Fox News is fair and accurate...) [...]

Have you actually watched Fox News? Compared to their venom spouting gibberish fake news BILD would be a quality newspaper.

And I hate BILD with a passion...

Says so in his official Biography.

And there has never been a Honey Comb for any Nexus device so far, so what's the point?

Since they quit using the way we used to mount drives, I don't know what drive is what any more. I know that all my drives have long ass character strings, but I don't even know how to get a list of drives any more as "sudo mount" doesn't do shit.

Not sure if you're referring to UUIDs, but a ls -Al /dev/disk/by-uuid should take care of that... shouldn't it? Been a while since I've used Ubuntu, but Debian lists all devices by UUID this way.

Well, judging by the cheerleading tone and the "Tour Groupon, The Funniest Startup We've Ever Been To (PHOTO TOUR)" link at the bottom it looks like msnbc has some issues staying objective on Groupon, so I'd take that article with a grain of salt.

Got a Notebook I bought June 2006 here with a built-in Webcam and I'm pretty sure that was already standard back then. Webcam is defnitely no indicator of a two year old computer.

complete with speaking in tongues. This was in a public school in Georgia, mind you.

Just read up on "speaking in tongues" at Wikipedia and, boy, my mind is blown! Really??? This person really muttered idiotic, incoherent syllables and wasn't fired/institutionalized on the spot, but did so regularly, in public? I'm still trying to wrap my mind around that. Wow, just wow. I don't get how someone that insane can be seen fit to teach children.

A very well written summary, that is basically how I understand the situation by reading the articles about this issue at heise Newsticker, Spiegel Online and fefes blog, too.

Wrong. That just means that 400 USD processor you're trying to sell was only worth 200 USD to begin with.

So where can I find a copy of the source code for Android 3.0, 3.1, or 3.2?

The AOSP git repository? Here's the announcement for 3.2: http://groups.google.com/group/android-building/browse_thread/thread/6a3b3a1c225a11f5/6f36c6c857cfe57f