Comment Re:hype.. (Score 1) 520
Hint... Subnetting for one? many more out there..
Please, if you insist on advocating a position that is, in the long term, costly and damaging to the world's infrastructure, at least know what you are talking about
Hint... Subnetting for one? many more out there..
Please, if you insist on advocating a position that is, in the long term, costly and damaging to the world's infrastructure, at least know what you are talking about
in this new world full connectivity is required not any more than a dedicated FedEx airplane from every city to every other city.
No.
You still need to be as "fully connected" as you'd ever be, with IPv6, or IPv4 with NAT. The connections STILL PHYSICALLY EXIST. The only difference is what kind of data is sent over those ports... there's no real reason for any scarcity, save for an arbitrary technical decision made in the early days of the TCP/IP Protocol
A better analogy would be, because humanity hypothetically ran out of unique postal addresses, everyone in the city shares the same address (name, address, everything), and the postman decides where to deliver the letter based on a the number of small cuts in the side. Wouldn't it make more sense to add more fields to the address, say, a ZIP code?
This is, in effect what IPv6 is doing. Adding more data to the address.
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.