Comment Shoulder surfers can now sit opposite. (Score 1) 25
Not the laptop for anyone with even the slightes security or privacy concerns then?
Not the laptop for anyone with even the slightes security or privacy concerns then?
Game Pass is only on Xbox consoles, and console gamers don't want PCs. Putting their games on the competition could make the next Xbox DOA.
Mate, you should give PC Game Pass a search some time.
Mandatory indicators to show AI has been used somewhere in content will become the default due to legal arse-covering. The message will be diluted to the point that it is as much use as those "may contain nuts" warnings and become similarly meaningless.
It's as easy as giving an email address like test@test.com
Even less typing: "a@a.com".
Even less typing: "a@a.ac"
Same, as soon as there was talk of XBOne being online-only, I realized consoles are dead. Then Sony pulled that shit with yanking the new Silent Hill demo off of the PS4s of people that downloaded it. Consoles are dead, PCs forever
I still have PT. It wasn't yanked from my PS4. It is no longer available to redownload if I ever delete it which is still a dick move but I have a backup and don't plan on deleting it. I'm probably unlikely to ever play it through again either, I just like having that option.
These will most likely be cloud gaming releases on the current Switch unless they port some older COD games. Hopefully a future Switch 2 will have the power to run native versions.
"I didn't have to pick a side" says the guy that then goes on to describe how he picked a side and how happy he is with that choice.
VR sex does not count as getting laid my friend.
"While I don't think there will be cake"
The cake is a lie.
Well, lets see. (Cr)apple makes insanely vastly overpriced, extremely low quality products, and is now being sued by a company that makes insanely vastly overpriced, extremely low quality cables and A/V accessories...if one of them loses and goes out of business, its a win for consumers. The only outcome better than that would be if BOTH could lose and go out of business!!! Both of these companies are committing fraud, somehow getting people to think that high price =quality product, and that owning (insert name of company that makes insanely vastly overpriced, extremely low quality products here) products makes them cool somehow.
People that buy products from companies like this need to wise up and realize that buying products from companies like these only makesthem and idiot (or an IDiot) for paying insanely high prices for the crappiest low quality products available!
Posted from my iPhone.
The thing is, easy piracy increases console sales.
Maybe in Europe and the 2nd and 3rd world, but not in the US, CA, NZ, AU, UK and Japan. Which...not-surprisingly, are the places with low piracy rates where people are actually willing to buy games.
The thing is, easy piracy increases console sales.
Maybe in Europe and the 2nd and 3rd world, but not in the US, CA, NZ, AU, UK and Japan. Which...not-surprisingly, are the places with low piracy rates where people are actually willing to buy games.
Piracy was rampant on both PlayStation and PlayStation 2 in the UK. This was largely because these generations coincided with the mass commoditisation of CD and then DVD burners in PCs. People may have been willing to buy games. However, willingness and ability are not the same thing. Many gamers had huge collections that they couldn't possibly have acquired legitimately. I can't speak for orher regions but I suspect the same would have been true.
...while I could see easily spending 1500 on games over the year for the 360, while being able to get about the same ~200 on the PC just a bit later after their release.
If you are spending 1500 a year (£ or $), you aren't playing games, you are just buying them.
Plus, even after both games have been out for over three years now, they can still be played, there are still servers for them.
Is it still possible to play FIFA 10 online?
I stopped buying EA Sports games after buying Tiger Woods 11 in mid 2011' only for the online features to be removed before the year was out, presumably to encourage buyers on to Tiger Woods 12. I expect more than 6 months of value from a game.
They don't offer free tethering because you have to pay for what you consume.
That other companies have the temerity to charge you extra just for the privilege of tethering is a whole other problem. That would be like the water company charging you extra for the privilege of using water to wash with instead of just drinking it.
The fact is, we pay for data plans, unlimited or metered. Either way, it should be ours to do as we wish with! The telcos should not be allowed (should not have any right) to impose on us any kinds of fees or limitations on what we have purchased from them. End of story.
Tethering charges on mobile phones are equivalent to the water company charging you more for attaching a hose to your tap so you can water your garden. Gouging, pure and simple. To those who say "but people watch videos and stuff on their laptops but just check email on their phones", plenty of people watch video on their phones and many only use their laptops for email. Don't make sweeping assumptions about everyone. The logical outcome to this scenario is charging for data usage by app type. Tethering obscures that, so precludes any move to that sort of business model. I paid for a set amount of data, not any consumption velocity or data type restrictions. If I wanted to use my month's allowance in less than an hour by streaming some HD video, then that's my choice. The way it works right now, lots of mobile networks are under-provisioned, meaning that even if I want to spend more money on heavy data usage, they aren't in any position to sell it to me. Don't even get me started on their "unlimited*" (*limited) marketing bullshit. How long can these phone companies and ISPs keep going without providing what their customers actually want?
2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League
