Probably some outrageously sexy SGI machine, like a Crimson, or an Onyx. You can probably pick one up today second hand for a fraction of the cost of an Amiga 3000 toy.
People pay for them? I gave mine away...on the condition that they came and carried it out of my house all by themselves. Those things are damn heavy.
Inkjets are cheap/easy/reliable?
I had so much trouble/expense with mine I eventually bought a color Laser printer instead. It turned out to be one of the best purchasing decisions I ever made, I would NEVER go back to using an inkjet.
TFA has just been updated saying it's MotoBlur with an automatically created Blur ID - it doesn't even ask you to create an account any more
I guess that was Motorola's way of "removing" MotoBlur from phones - remove the account creation UI, generate the account secretly without any prompting.
Whatever, Motorola deserves to be bankrupted over this. If I was a class-action lawyer I'd be getting in touch with this guy right now.
Don't know about deceit, but I do know that my Firefox's noscript blocked no less than sixteen (16) separate sites running scripts on TFA.
So if anyone has an interest in fast browsers, they have.
I mean, 16, what possible excuse is there for that on what is effectively just a news article?
News sites are by far the worst for that. The number of sites some of them them pull Javascript from is staggering.
70+ years of continuous operation for a pump isn't TOO terrible.
It's more of a MTBF than a garantee. Some of them fail after a much shorter time.
Or like a terrible pump design. Intelligent design my ass, more like idiotic design.
A truly intelligent design would have built-in redundancy in case the main pump fails.
We've got two eyes, two ears, two lungs, two kidneys
Remember Apple sells me a device, Google sells me.
Riiiiight. Apple never spied on anybody.
I think it might be this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motoblur
Lots of phones/providers sync your personal data for you in case you lose your phone.
(And I'm sure there's an option somewhere to turn it off, although you never know with big corporations...)
You say that like the source to GCC isn't available....
I hope you compiled your copy of GCC by hand using pencil and paper.
Using any precompiled compiler on any precompiled file system or OS kernel would break the chain of trust.
Quantum computers don't work against AES.
AES
The 128-bit version remains secure. The 256 and 192-bit versions are believed secure but have shown cracks (they should really have had a couple more encryption rounds).
The 256/192-bit versions are just re-fiddlings of the 128-bit version, made to fulfill the NIST requirements for key sizes. This was largely a waste of time since 128-bits can't be brute-forced with any imaginable technology.
(My advice to any potential cryptograpy coders out there is to stick with the 128 bit version).
This is often quoted as an example of NSA's supposed superiority in cryptography but that happened back in the '70s when there were hardly any cryptographers or computers in the world.
The knowledge gap between the NSA and independent cryptographers has closed a lot since then.
It's not so easy to make sure that a program is a correct implementation of a mathematical algorithm or of an open standard.
There's a huge list of test vectors for AES published by NIST (among others): http://csrc.nist.gov/archive/aes/rijndael/wsdindex.html
The chances of being able to write some code which reproduces those values but ISN'T AES are less than the reciprocal of the number of atoms in the universe.
The solution to "cyberwarfare" is extremely simple: Don't connect your power stations and nuclear missile silos to the Internet.
What's a "Window" key? I don't think my Model M has one of those.
One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.
