Obviously the wetlands beavers create will sink a huge amounts of carbon over their lifetimes. It’s strange these researchers have neglected to mention that. They also never seem to mention that higher CO2 concentrations increase plant growth in general, as do higher temperatures. They focus heavily on “runaway warming” and positive feedback loops, but never mention the significant sources of negative feedback. Furthermore, these positive feedback loops always seem to relate to methane, a potent but not persistent greenhouse gas.

False.

I was going to say, it's pretty clear that they are talking about the temperature of the plasma, and that temperature is not unusual for plasma. The real problem is that the temperature of the plasma says nothing about how well the coating will perform, so they're not really giving us useful data about the quality of the product.

The fact that it can take years to get a permit like this, and it will make the news when you do, is a huge red flag. Our approval process is deeply flawed.

It's surprising how many people don't seem to realize just how toxic the stuff is. If it weren't absolutely essential to our modern economy today, it would never be handled by untrained people, or burned and emitted into the atmosphere.

He seems to be saying that the company produced too much content and it diluted the focus and attention of their staff? Am I wrong? It doesn’t appear that he’s blaming audiences for Disney’s poor performance.

I'm constantly hearing people spouting what is essentially uninformed nonsense about carbon fiber. It is a reliable, well understood material that has been around for a very long time now. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with it. The make boats out of it. They make aircraft out of it. All kinds of marine equipment is made from it. You don't know what you are talking about.

Just about every single military submarine ever built has a cylindrical pressure vessel. Again, if there were something wrong with it, we would know. These aren't radical, untested technologies.

If your insights are valuable in a monetary sense, you ought to be able to find someone to pay you for them. But, as I understand it, the problem is that people are unwilling to pay.

The whole protest is so stupid. What are they even protesting? Not giving away the service for free? It's a for-profit company...

Tesla has made NACS available for free, so there’s nothing stopping EA or anyone else from using it, legally speaking. In fact, you should expect them to announce that they are switching to NACS in the future.

It's progressive because they do it to fight "gentrification" and "greedy developers."

Developers donâ(TM)t build housing they donâ(TM)t expect to be able to sell. Of course, all new housing will be sold at the market rate. That doesnâ(TM)t mean you give up building new housing.

EVs don't really broadcast interference, the effect it highly localized. It's not that hard to make an EV with a working AM radio, but it's not worth the effort since most people wouldn't use it.

That's what Ai enhancement is. How do people think this stuff works?

Oh, so 2/3 of the applications are approved on the first try? Are these for brain implants? Do they involve novel surgical techniques? Probably not.
Most firms give up after 3 tries? Are they firms with a single product and a specific goal of bringing that product to market. Do they have essentially unlimited funding from the wealthiest person in the world? No? So that's not really relevant either, is it? This is just more FUD from the usual suspects.