> Actually, they do.

In your example, no person has lost a right.

Exactly wrong. CU and SpeechNow resulted in corporations being able to SPEND money, not CONTRIBUTE money. That is, they can spend it on speech in support of something.

They still cannot directly contribute, nor coordinate.

What's the exchange going on here?

Is that in local currency? Geeze. I make that much in a place that costs 1/3rd the amount to live in.

The act of creating the server was disconnected from any act of sending mail, in time, and in mind. She didn't even create the server, after all. That happened in like, 2007.

"gross negligence" != "extreme carelessness". As the FBI specifically said. One is a legal term, with specific criteria, and the other is colloquial.

Gross negligence requires some aspect of voluntary and conscious disregard, usually, by the way. Which means she has to have known some specific information was classified when she sent it, and known that she should not be doing so.

It would be, but the FBI does not believe she lied to them. Comey said exactly that during his House testimony.

Thanks, Project Fi!

Good news, every piece of software you are now running is IPv6 compatible. If an application establishes a connection to a host name, all of the underlying OS stacks can do so over IPv6 if addresses are available and connections can be made.

Of course, those apps that have four little input boxes and only support hard coding an IP for a connection still won't work. Have any of those? I don't.

I pulled it off in my network in about a month. Since it's enabled by default in pretty much every major OS, the only thing required was to lease IP space and configure the routers to push addresses. Magically now most of my trafffic goes over IPv6.

My view is that even though you might not need these skills, the very act of attempting to learn them alters the way your brain is capable of solving problems in a way that is indispensable.

My company is already using IPv6 addresses. All of our sites have public addresses... as well as all of our desktops. All of our users now use Facebook and Google over IPv6. So... nothing will help me adopt it. Already done.

It also reports on her saying she intended to give it to her cousin in Iran as a gift. So she admitted it to the news station.

What did the employee hear her saying in Farsi? Got me, but if it was that, then he seems in the clear.

Most of us are agnostic atheists. Including Dawkins, Hitchens, and the rest. You may have missed that.

a-theist means without God. One who does not accept that God exists is an atheist. One does not need to also hold the positive belief that God does not exist.

I'm going to disagree with you. It's true that propositions that are at least plausible testable are more likely to be true than those that aren't, but the fact is you're trusting the scientists to do the tests, and accurately report their findings.

Which I'm fine with. Trust in science itself can be built on the overwhelming number of things that science does that are testable by you right now. Such as whether your cell phone turns on or not. Whether GPS works. Or by your personal experience with the results of other science: understanding electricity, and thus running your tests by wiring a lightbulb.