Yeah, we've already seen this. See also this interesting article on SBM: https://sciencebasedmedicine.o...

Okay, but how does it compare in terms of audio quality?

Even if that were true, are you truly comparing the hypothesis of a couple of scientist versus the overall global consensus that has been gathering over the years?
Do you even know how science works?

Care to provide any link for that?

It's always surprising to me how much people are attracted to authoritarianism, regardless of the political background.

So now a simple (old style!) convnet is AI?

Sometimes I seriously wonder whether those dumb comments are: a. misspelled intentionally, or b. from somebody without a decent education, or c. from a non-native troll.

Itâ(TM)s Mat Kelcey, no âsâ(TM).

Apps connected to the card are extremely popular in London, and they immediately warn the user of an expense. If something like that were to happen you'd see a lot of unhappy bystanders!

And mine was an apology and admission that I need some sleep :)

Yep, it was "unanimous" and I can't spell. :p

Wow, way to talk without knowing a thing about it.

AlphaGo managed to beat one of the best player in recent history (Lee Sedol) last year, then went on a 60-0 strike against the highest ranked professionals. Now he won a tournament with the world champion without ever showing a weakness. The experts were pretty much anonymous that he never had a chance at this point.

DeepMind have already published the details of the algorithm in a Nature paper and will do the same with the recent improvements later this year. I guess if you're right nobody will be able to reproduce the results...

The US Military is a resource to be utilized, not fucking sit around on their asses all day, especially considering the cost of doing nothing with it.

Avoiding the use of force is strategically the best goal for a weapon. When you get to use it often, you have to keep a larger stock around hence the ballooning (since the 50s, mind you) costs of the military.

Let me ask you a simple question: what is the role of the US military? Defend the country? Be the world's cop? If it's the former we have way too much capacity (how many carriers you need to defend the coasts?). If it's the latter we need to increase x10 because it's never gonna end, and one start to wonder why we have to foot the bill for a job we haven't voted for.

Spoken like a true civilian.

Right, let's have the army run the country. That has always worked well. /s (- just in case)

Neat, more than $93M ($1.59M unit cost according to wikipedia) gone in a single (non war related) strike.
Thanks goodness he saved money by cutting the budget of EPA and NSF! /s

Can you go past the partisanship and look at the evidence/policies instead? If all you care is listen to one side of the story you'll never be objective.