Comment Prior art for incomplete theories (Score 1) 200
So the one thing I take away from this is that scientists really do not have a convincing working model for current observed cosmological gravitation behaviors. This reminds me of a different time when scientists seemed to have no working theory. Back in the late nineteenth century, scientists were trying to explain how the sun generated so much energy. When you did calculations based on energy outputs from standard chemical reactions, the maximum possible output for the sun was computed to be orders of magnitude less than the actual output. It was not until nuclear fusion was properly understood in the twentieth century that an adequate theory was put together that could explain the sun's energy output.
We are again at a scenario where predicted models say there should be a lot less of a something, and we are trying to stitch in theories to try to explain how there is so much more of the something than expected. And if you believe that scientists are unhappy about this, then you do not know scientists. A baffled scientist is an excited scientist.
We are again at a scenario where predicted models say there should be a lot less of a something, and we are trying to stitch in theories to try to explain how there is so much more of the something than expected. And if you believe that scientists are unhappy about this, then you do not know scientists. A baffled scientist is an excited scientist.