I mean...no?
I don't ride the scooters because they're way too fast for narrow-ass sidewalks and no good place to park them. As far as "high-asshole-density area", welcome to America.

An extra 2-5 of traffic to have sidewalks not littered with scooters, and being able to walk down the sidewalk without getting hit by a scooter sounds good to me.

That kind of sums up the entire career of U2 for me. MTV, radio, commercials, bar jukebox, random background music in a place of commerce, etc

I agree with you on the theory, but not quite sure about the execution

Everybody who didn't pay for a Microsoft email account had the entire contents of their mailbox at risk for the past 6 months...

"...the issue is much worse than previously reported, with the hackers able to access email content from a large number of Outlook, MSN, and Hotmail email accounts, according to a source who witnessed the attack in action and described it before Microsoft’s statement, as well as screenshots provided to Motherboard. Microsoft confirmed to Motherboard that hackers gained access to the content of some customers’ emails."

https://motherboard.vice.com/e...

My first thought when I read the headline was "yeah, right". I checked the source link, saw it was cnn, then read the rest of the summary to see how many holes I could find. I'm sure the actual paper is fine, and they seem to have a decent sample size and timeframe, but the summary leaves out a lot of details that are linkely in there somewhere and substantially alter the final conclusions.

BoooOOOooOOoOoOoOoOoOOOOOOOOOO

The RHEL/CentOS relationship is not adversarial, and the impact of CentOS on RHEL sales is likely overall or wash or maybe a net positive. It's the "first one is free" mindset. You get people using CentOS for free, so the skillset and familiarity is there for RHEL. If CentOS wasn't there, then a company that would have run it would be saying to itself "well, I guess we'll just pay for RHEL licensing", they would either use another free distro or just use Windows, which is likely cheaper anyways.

Companies that use RHEL will also factor in CentOS to the overall environment cost. A full complement of Dev/Testing/UAT/Prod with RHEL licensing is more expensive than the same deployment with Windows. Use CentOS for all or even a portion of those outside of production and RHEL becomes more cost effective.

You could always move to the US, then you would likely be either just the right weight or possibly even a paragon of health.

Have you found any good resources/guidance on doing that? Most I've been able to come up with so far is "nobody really knows".

...and are you deducting your mining gear and electricity/cooling costs?

How many /. accounts do you have?

Challenge: Accepted!

That will really fuck with people who come over and try using my microwave.

I have a brother printer and it prints just fine from my iPhone. I think your house guest may have been defective.

At least until you try converting your cryptocurrency into govt money and the exchange is "down for maintenance". The exchanges (well, *somebody*) also take a cut when you make a transfer, it's just not of the magnitude that credit card companies do.