It is not a "disaster". No one was hurt and passengers were able to get to their destination in the end.
I wonder how often incidents like these happen? Boeing is in the spotlight now, so these are likely to be reported more than usual.
Also, Airbus is not totally clean either. There is a reason the Airbus CEO is unhappy, as incidents that happen at Boeing may very well happen with Airbus, even if Airbus has objectively better safety overall, which is not a given, it is not perfect either. Which mean Airbus will be on a higher scrutiny too, and may also get more bad press for minor incidents. Overall, it may end up being good for air travel safety (maybe less for air travel costs), so that's not all bad, but I understand that it is going to hurt the bottom lines of the whole industry.
And in fact, this particular incident may not even have to do with Boeing, in could have been improper maintenance, or most likely, as it is often the case, shared responsibility. But of course, since Boeing is in the spotlight, the fingers points at them.
What French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said is also very telling: "I prefer Airbus' situation to that of Boeing,". Which could be interpreted as "Boeing had a stroke of bad luck, good for Airbus that it didn't happen to them instead". A very cautious phrasing.