>Sorry, but declining vaccine efficiency was expected from day one, interesting claim, got a source? I sure didn't hear anyone at the rollout talking about how this vax would only be good for a few months then have declining effectiveness. Or hear them claim, you will still get sick, and will still spread covid, but you wont die as much after taking this medicine, for a few months. Why hasn't declining efficiency happened with other vax? If there is declining efficiency of the vax, aren't we just selecting for a more "efficient" virus in that case?
>We still don't know the origin of COVID, but lab leak is below the 50% line. What is the "line" Who drew the line? A bat 1000km away from the first case giving the virus to a pangolin who then infected 3 lab workers who work at a *CORONA VIRUS RESEARCH CENTER* that was doing gain of function research on...coronavirus sounds pretty complicated.
>it was never "save limited supply of N-95 masks for those most exposed" that's revisionism. be honest about what was said and claimed.
>for some reason? Most governments world wide are happy to keep their foot down on the FUD pedal to use the ensuing chaos to exert even more control over other peoples lives.
So to me your entire post sounds like "I like to be mean and cruel to other humans because I find it fun, and these conditions give me a way to engage in my sadism without social censure"