We would always meet with our offshore team in the morning. By end of our day we would ensure they had proper instructions and details of where we left off. In a way it made it feel like we had round-the-clock work being done.

Granted, this means there has to be very good leadership and communication being performed on both sides. And more times than not this is not the case. This is why people have bad views of offshore teams. But it is the companies involved (on both sides) that are the problem as they often put non-technical people to lead from onshore a group of offshore technical people. The communication is almost non-existent and confusion quickly sets in to the projects.

>at least when residents also had high levels of trust in each other.

Reads like the people who conducted the study came to the conclusion about dogs while ignoring possible other factors that may be of higher importance to the reason of lower crime.

Ukraine says they lied. But Russia has been in development of such a weapon for a few years now. It being used in a battlefield situation actually isn't unlikely. They used their hypersonic missiles in combat just a few weeks back. Look at what the statement reads: they shot down a single drone after 5 seconds. That is feasible with current laser technologies as drones are generally lightweight and thus flimsy by design. The real tricky part is target tracking (have to keep it on target to a flying vehicle) and powering it.

So don't discount this as real. But I doubt it will be used in any real capacity or impact in this conflict. This was likely a single prototype that is very early in design.

It is funny you bring up "Vlad" as Russia is currently heavily censoring its media and internet which you want the US to do. You have a lot in common.

Like how Facebook was. Now its nothing but censorship and it algorithms trying to put content I didn't ask for in front of me. And what is with the "sensitive" blocks? I'm not sensitive so stop trying to block stuff from my non-sensitive eyes.

Nowadays it seems they are moving options around in their old products and calling them updates. And here we have them acting like some old white collar company with "butts in seats" so middle management has a job and executives can quietly collect their bonuses from their beach front property in some foreign country.

Microsoft seems more progressive.

You mean those people and scenarios you make up in your head but have no link to actual reality but you want to talk about to seem virtuous? Or is that fap material? Is everyone covered in oil in these fantasies?

Keynesian solution to problems is always "just spend more money". If you want to achieve real balance you have to follow what Germany did with austerity measures a decade ago. Look at their economy today.

Assange in a video interview stating it was not the Russians back in 2017:

https://www.realclearpolitics....

Your turn.

Also the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) does not say anything about censoring to hide a whistleblowers name. So using that as an excuse isn't an excuse.

Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers

https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

"Increasingly, the iconic American planemaker and its subcontractors have relied on temporary workers making as little as $9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in aerospace -- notably India."

Think of all the money they saved by outsourcing.

Huawei, which is China government by proxy, has no interest in any string-free collaboration with Europe as Europe is just as much their enemy as the NSA.

There are no US chip manufacturers this would be competing with. Lucian Armasu is just your typical anti-American moron.

The biggest advocates against facial recognition are also pro-illegal immigration. Think about it.

There should be some law against giving potential voters something financial in return for votes in their favor. It reeks of bribery.