Screw curtains, that''s for the bourgeoisie. Get a roll of aluminum foil and a roll of duct tape. The money you save can be used for meth.

On second thought, skip the first two and letâ(TM)s get straight to the purple drank. It wonâ(TM)t prevent anything, but I wonâ(TM)t care.

but alas journalism was reduced to cutting and pasting corporate press releases some years ago.

It won't even work with my state of the art F6

It was demoed at the end of the sprint and the product owner accepted the story.

do you mean to say that you would wear a mask to see Idocracy in a theater. Otherwise, no thank you. you are a believer in immunity exercise and eating good home cooked meals with healthy ingredients, you haven't had a cold or any sickness in well over 4 years, and have been continuously listening to a lot of microbiologists and scientists, while reviewing the data, and it is just illogical for healthy people to wear masks unless you are trying to re-create a 2020s version of Idiocracy.

is that what you are saying?

2-3 percent of the US population is 8,000,000 to 12,000,000 people (8 to 12 million)

https://xkcd.com/378/

'male' is a substring of 'female' any search for the string 'female' would not match 'male' but a search for the string 'male' would match 'female'

It couldn't be that simple could it?

but how could a six ounce sparrow carry an eight ounce coconut?

whoosh

That sounds pretty insulting to me. Pointing out a error is not an insult. The word "incompetent" is an insult.

Well the "ability" to have insecure (meaning public) data on s3 is a necessary part of their service for many use cases.
But the **default** setting on any s3 bucket (the actual term for the resource on their service) is to have it private and can only be read by users that have been granted explicit authority.
That makes this story that much more tragic, because a problem of this nature requires that some fuckwit actually logged into amazon and edited the settings on this bucket to "make public"
How that happened, is a simple one-D-ten-T (1D10T) class of problem.

"That, my friends, is the prime reason why speculating in cryptocurrency is a bad idea!"

It seems that if this stuff is worth stealing, it has value. Wouldn't that make it a good candidate for speculative investment? Now allowing some half-assed third party to hold my investment in a way that could allow hackers to gain control of my funds, now that sounds like a bad idea.

oh i'm keeping that one

heheh