Comment Re:Fuck Net Neutrality (Score 1) 296
Truer words...
Truer words...
So you plan to discontinue using the Internet when prices go up, which will probably be next year after the bill passes.
Hope for the best, plan for the worst
Restricting the rights of companies to more thoroughly fuck over their customers? Oh, the horror!
Blarg, replied before really reading the whole post. Disregard
I mean, you'd just need to work out which precise areas you had to munge. Make the eyes a slightly different shade of blue or whatever. If the algorithm accepts a certain amount of fudge factor that's kind of stretching the definition of "hash."
It does if it's hashing the binary photo data, which is what GP was talking about. For that matter, cropping the photo would do it.
The facial recognition is just to recognize whether it *is* a face, not match it against others it's seen. If by "hashes" they literally meant a hash like MD5 or SHA-1.
It would be pretty funny if people started all using a slightly munged photo of Mark Zuckerberg.
So you just apply a filter to the photo that adds a little random visual noise to the data, and everybody can still use the same photo.
Whitelist, not blacklist.
This whole thing is still a government consideration. Nothing gives YOU the right to destroy the thing legally, which was your initial claim:
If he has the right to draw a painting declaring that god hates me ? I have the right to piss on that painting.
Maybe it had something to do with the only possible property damage they could've argued was walking on the grass. This example is obtuse and you know it.
You mean they'll arrest me under laws that basically don't exist anywhere in Europe ?
Oh alright, the context upthread was about Holocaust laws in Germany.
Lets use a more accurate analogy. If you forget to pull your handbrake up when you park, and your car starts running down a road and is about to run me down - I sure as fuck will get out of the way EVEN if that means your car hits a pole instead and gets destroyed.
What is this, some kind of terrible trolley problem analogy? That doesn't work at all in this context. You're not destroying the car.
Hate art that harms me
You're undoubtedly not even a Jew, so excuse me while I blow a raspberry at your "mental anguish."
I have a right to destroy that property your property rights do not extend to the point of intruding on MY rights not to be harmed.
You've seriously never heard the "my right to swing my fists ends at your face" line before? This is such a stupid slippery slope argument. Would me painting a dildo on the side of my car cause you mental anguish? What about a firearm? What about a Republican bumper sticker? Do all those give you the "right" to destroy my car? Because MENTAL ANGUISH!! D:
You mean you didn't hear about Silver Night when the KGB duct taped everyone's mouths across the entire country shut?
“This is the latest escalation in the left’s never-ending judicial war, the most audacious yet,” Mr. McConnell said, after describing Democratic opposition in the past to Judge Robert H. Bork and Justice Clarence Thomas. “And it cannot and it will not stand. There cannot be two sets of standards: one for the nominees of the Democratic president and another for the nominees of Republican presidents.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
The hypocrisy is strong with these jerks.
Only through hard work and perseverance can one truly suffer.