Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:survey says -- (Score 1) 35

You can think about it based on the uncertainty principle, which allows for borrowing energy for a limited time. The more energy you borrow, the less time you have. With a mass close to Rubidium, a virtual W boson can't survive for long, limiting the maximum travel distance significantly.

Comment Re:Stop me if this doesn't make sense. (Score 1) 24

If the volume of all singularities is zero

Is it though?

How do you measure volume, if your ruler is being sucked inwards faster than the speed of light? How do you measure where the mass is if its world line ended at the singularity years ago?

What about other models for the internals of a black hole, which attempt to unify quantum mechanics? Does the world line actually form a loop at the event horizon?

We know that our understanding of the physics inside a black hole is probably wrong. Because it doesn't explain how quantum information is absorbed, then released when the black hole evaporates.

Comment Re:Unexplained (Score 1) 35

The wave of "stretch" passes us at the speed of light. But the rate of "stretch" is slow.

Picture a tank of water, 1m deep. A bouy on the surface, using pulses of sound to measure depth. A wave 1km wide passes the bouy, also at the speed of sound. The bouy could send 1000 pulses before the wave disappears.

Comment Re:Knee-jerk easy answer (Score 1) 210

Yes, but the bit Tesla battery is pugged into the wholesale layer of the network. Not at the street level where the problem is located. Solar power can't be shipped back up the grid, it must be consumed by your neighbours.

I have no sympathy for the network operators. This is an entirely foreseeable problem, that they should have been trying to solve for the last decade.

  • power has been too expensive for too long
  • people install solar to cut costs
  • power network threatens solar users, or raises prices elsewhere

Repeat

Comment Re:First gen products (Score 1) 274

If you have a bunch of 3rd party Intel code, sure each of them will be translated once and stored on disk. But after that, the Intel code will not be in memory. Loading the translated binaries into memory will not be significantly larger than their Intel counter parts would have been.

I'm not really sure where your misunderstanding is, but you're clearly confused about something.

Comment Re:Spoiler (Score 1) 256

> GC is always going to give you some level of latency. Well... I suppose that may be technically true. But only because the CPU must be doing some work, taking cycles away from your application. Building a GC that never needs to stop your thread should be theoretically possible.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...