Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Google search is shit (Score 2) 85

Indeed:

A Google spokesperson told Business Insider that the company is essentially just giving users what they want: "Our research has shown that people often want to learn from others' experiences with a topic

In other words, screw the power users, we make money with dumb users hence we prioritize dumb results to all your searches and ignore any modifiers which are only used by power users anyway.

Comment Re:Not mine (Score 1) 49

Disclaimer: I have solar panels (good investment). I do not have batteries (bad investment).

Good point, you can't imagine how much money I have spent on batteries over the years for UPS. I would never consider that an "investment" more like a cost of operation. I have solar and wind too to recharge the batteries but not enough to keep me going in the middle of the night when there is no wind and even then.

Comment Re:Our substitute for meaningful privacy legislati (Score 1) 54

i view this a bit different - sure apps and companies can gather everything they want - but they can't put you in Jail and strip you of your rights. Government can. This ads a clear layer requirement before Government can outsource work to companies they know they are not allowed to do (which is what has been happening).

Pulling your data from app aggregators is no different than your library checkout history or your video rental history - and this finely puts a line in the sand on it.

Of course they can do the same as basically stripping you of your so called rights like; getting insurance at a reasonable price if able to get any just to name one because apps have snitched on you. No government needed.

Comment Re:Our substitute for meaningful privacy legislati (Score 1) 54

Anyway, I am getting sick of those FA about legislation against big tech, the majority coming from EU. I know I am a little selfish because big tech schemes don't really impact me. I must be dreaming out loud but I think money should be invested in education instead. Educated Internet users would quickly turn down all the big tech schemes and make them useless. I mean, if no data about yourself is there, what data would there be to buy? Educate users instead and make the data about users who don't care available to everybody so there is nothing to buy! But maybe governments think educating users would diminish their power so they rather keep themselves busy making legislation, who knows?

Comment Re:If you don't get caught... (Score 1) 34

Spending $3.5 million of somebody else's money to 'acquire' a million of your own seems to me a perfectly acceptable ROI!

I take the $3.5 million figure with a grain of salt. I suspect it's a little like the amounts they state on drug charges. It probably costed less than $1 million in electricity charges, maybe even less than $500,000. The rest is only what they could have potentially charged at the maximum possible rate to their customers for using their gears.

Comment Re:Dry your eyes (Score 1) 60

Dry your eyes. Windows NT, which is the technology running all the current versions of Windows, is the next-generation, 64-bit VAX/VMS and was heavily influenced, if not created by the same creators of VAX/VMS.

Indeed, and nobody will ever need more than 64 bits!

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...