Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment How to drive customers away in one easy step! (Score 1) 30

"The company has temporarily installed the biometrics machines this month inside a Showfields Inc. interactive mall and at a Rimowa Distribution Inc. luggage store in New York City as well as a Rimowa in San Francisco."

Three places I will never consider visiting...EVER.

Oh, and an interactive mall sounds like wall to wall advertising punching you in the face as you stagger through.

Canada

Canadian Government Accused of Trying to Introduce Internet Censorship (vancouversun.com) 293

"After more than 25 years of Canadian governments pursuing a hands-off approach to the online world, the government of Justin Trudeau is now pushing Bill C-10, a law that would see Canadians subjected to the most regulated internet in the free world," argues the Vancouver Sun (in an article shared by long-time Slashdot reader theshowmecanuck): Although pitched as a way to expand Canadian content provisions to the online sphere, the powers of Bill C-10 have expanded considerably in committee, including a provision introduced last week that could conceivably allow the federal government to order the deletion of any Facebook, YouTube, Instagram or Twitter upload made by a Canadian. In comments this week, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh indicated his party was open to providing the votes needed to pass C-10, seeing the bill as a means to combat online hate...

The users themselves may not necessarily be subject to direct CRTC regulation, but social media providers would have to answer to every post on their platforms as if it were a TV show or radio program. This might be a good time to mention that members of the current Liberal cabinet have openly flirted with empowering the federal government to control social media. In a September Tweet, Infrastructure Minister Catherine McKenna said that if social media companies "can't regulate yourselves, governments will." Guilbeault, the prime champion of Bill C-10, has spoken openly of a federal regulator that could order takedowns of any social media post that it deems to be hateful or propagandistic...

Basically, if your Canadian website isn't a text-only GeoCities blog from 1996, Bill C-10 thinks it's a program deserving of CRTC regulation. This covers news sites, podcasts, blogs, the websites of political parties or activist groups and even foreign websites that might be seen in Canada...

The penalties prescribed by Bill C-10 are substantial. For corporations, a first offence can yield penalties of up to $10 million, while subsequent offences could be up to $15 million apiece. If TikTok, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube are suddenly put in a situation where their millions of users must follow the same rules as a Canadian cable channel or radio station, it's not unreasonable to assume they may just follow Facebook's example [in Australia] and take the nuclear option.

Comment Re:Configure Your Linksys!! (Score 4, Insightful) 48

The IP blocks have been publicly listed with ARIN since at last 1985.
If you didn't care for the last 35 years, why on earth would you start to care today?

Or put another way, why did you willingly *allow* connections to these IP blocks for 35 years?
Why did you choose to let that happen?

People care now because a private entity is announcing these blocks instead of the U.S. Government. Who knows what this private entity is doing with these blocks. What data are they collecting? What will they do with said data? Are they subject to the same privacy laws as the U.S. Government? Can I FOIA this private entity to find out? Probably not.

Comment Re:how about a libel lawsuit? (Score 1) 66

While I'd love to see SteamDB fight back on this, lawyers cost money. Cases cost money. Kind of hard to justify a lawsuit when the chance of recovery is slim and could take years. I mean, the FTC fought a 4 year anti-trust battle against Qualcomm before giving up. And that was the federal government!

I do wish the DMCA has some kind of punitive measure for these shady and broke-ass DMCA notices.

Comment Re:10MB or "up to" 10MB? (Score 1) 260

I'd bet my Gig/E connect that these goofy speeds will come with some cap or bandwidth throttling mechanism ala Comcast or these mobile networks.

I still can't believe we're talking about some 15-20yr old copper tech in 2021. That's just shameful.

This AT&T nonsense is just their management trying to skimp on delivering respectable internet speeds.

And for those people saying 10Mbps is "good enough" - take out all that "extra" RAM in your PCs. Clearly, 640k is good enough for you.

Comment Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 260

Tell that to the astroturf posters above who are apparently happy with crappy xDSL tech from like 15yrs ago. Reminds me of that old Bill Gates quote about 640K RAM being good enough. Just absurd.

AT&T can push 400Gbps and higher speeds on inter-city links but God forbid they should deliver reasonable speeds to their customers.

Comment What happened to AT&T? (Score 4, Interesting) 260

Are they refusing the obvious because they are so badly managed and carry so much debt? This company used to be the gold standard of network-service providers - like a UUnet. Now? They're a laughing stock that has to be shamed into delivering minimal fiber speeds.

It's a sad day.

Comment Re:Just absurd (Score 4, Insightful) 153

While you make a great point about FB being an enabler, from what I've seen people like Bannon can turn on a dime and go after companies or people with whom they might disagree at some point. Case in point - Fox News and Trump. While Fox News hasn't completely turned on Trump, they are leaning in that direction.

Another case in point - Trump wanting to make a digital media channel to try and screw over Fox News - the very same org that enabled him over the last 4 years.

Slashdot Top Deals

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Working...