Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Submission + - Giuliani predicts deadly earthquake, censored ( 2

Khashishi writes: Seismologist Giampaolo Giuliani claims to have predicted the deadly earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy, that killed at least 92 people. His attempts at warning the public were reported to the authorities and his warnings were censored to prevent public panic.

It must be noted that accurate earthquake prediction is not well-established within the science community, so what is the government's proper response?

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Giuliani predicts deadly earthquake, censored

Comments Filter:
  • From TFA:

    ''To say that there will be an earthquake somewhere means nothing. Predicting means indicating time, place and magnitude. At present it is impossible to do this,'' Guerra said.

    ''There have been earthquakes without the emission of radon gas just as there have been emissions of radon gas without earthquakes. Thus this method is far from perfect''

    Not saying NWS is wrong or that this guy is right, but if you were to hold tornadoes to the same time, place, magnitude standard Guerra puts forth here, we'd never have a tornado warning go off until after it has passed overhead (seeing as to how unpredictable the path and magnitude are are any given point.) After all, there have been swirling clouds and thunderstorms without tornadoes, and tornadoes without (observed) swirling clouds, so we can't use that as a predictor, right?

    Note I'm also no

When a fellow says, "It ain't the money but the principle of the thing," it's the money. -- Kim Hubbard