Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×
Space

Submission + - Dark Energy not necessary after all? (abc.net.au) 1

ttnuagmada writes: 'Dark energy', which researchers have spent years trying to fathom, isn't necessary to explain our universe after all, according to a new solution to Einstein's theory of general relativity. This challenges the notion that dark energy makes up 76% of our universe, as many cosmologists believe.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Dark Energy not necessary after all?

Comments Filter:
  • Well, one of the problems with applying Einstein's general theory to cosmological problems is that the textbook version really doesn't work very well in that context. Einstein's implementation of a general theory was devised around the assumption that it'd have to reduce to special relativity over small regions, and as a result, it tends to come with some additional baggage that doesn't really work in the context of modern cosmology.

    Einstein originally constructed his general theory around the assumption

A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth

Working...