Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×
Software

Submission + - Mercurial, Subversion and Git: Pros and Cons

talexb writes: "I'm curious about Mercurial, a replacement for my current version control system, Subversion, and wonder what other SlashDot readers think about those two and about Git, the version control used for the Linux kernel. I've read several blog posts and articles and what I get from all that is, Git: very complex, very fast, but slows down without manual repacking; Subversion: simple, fast, doesn't branch well, efficient; Mercurial: not so simple, very fast, branches well, very efficient. Which one of these do you use, and why? What do you like and dislike about it?"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mercurial, Subversion and Git: Pros and Cons

Comments Filter:

"If truth is beauty, how come no one has their hair done in the library?" -- Lily Tomlin

Working...