Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×
Databases

Submission + - Is the One-Size-Fits-All Database Dead?

jlbrown writes: "In a new benchmarking paper (http://nms.csail.mit.edu/~stavros/pubs/osfa.pdf), MIT professor Mike Stonebraker and colleagues demonstrate that specialized databases can have dramatic performance advantages (factor of 10 or higher) over traditional databases in four areas: text processing, data warehousing, stream processing, and scientific and intelligence applications. The paper includes some interesting "apples to apples" performance comparisons between commercial implementations of specialized architectures and relational databases in two areas: data warehousing and stream processing.

From the paper: 'A single code line will succeed whenever the intended customer base is reasonably uniform in their feature and query requirements. One can easily argue this uniformity for business data processing. However, in the last quarter century, a collection of new markets with new requirements has arisen. In addition, the relentless advance of technology has a tendency to change the optimization
tactics from time to time.'"

"If you want to eat hippopatomus, you've got to pay the freight." -- attributed to an IBM guy, about why IBM software uses so much memory

Working...