Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Submission + - Did evolution start on Mars? Probably not. (arstechnica.com)

schweinhundert writes: Last week saw the suggestion at a geochemistry conference that life may have been more likely to start on Mars than on Earth due to the presence of molybdenite minerals. This week comes another argument, from Christopher Adcock of University of Nevada Las Vegas, published in Nature Geoscience (paywall), that Mars is likely where chemical evolution began, because Earth lacked a good source of usable phosphorous. Not so fast, says geochemist, Matthew Pasek of University of South Florida, in the same issue of the journal. The Earth had a large number of phosphorous bearing meteorites called schreibersite, which recently has been shown to phosphorylate organic molecules in his lab.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Did evolution start on Mars? Probably not.

Comments Filter:

This is the theory that Jack built. This is the flaw that lay in the theory that Jack built. This is the palpable verbal haze that hid the flaw that lay in...

Working...