Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Submission + - Github Finally Agrees Public Repos Should Have Open Source Licenses (infoworld.com) 2

WebMink writes: After strong criticism last year, Github has finally accepted the view that public repositories with no open source license are a bad thing. Self-described as the "world's largest open source community," a significant number of GitHub projects come with no rights whatsoever for you to use their code in an open source project.

But from now on, creators of new repositories will have to pick from a small selection of OSI-approved licenses or explicitly opt for "no license". In Github's words, "please note that opting out of open source licenses doesn't mean you're opting out of copyright law."

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Github Finally Agrees Public Repos Should Have Open Source Licenses

Comments Filter:

"Trust me. I know what I'm doing." -- Sledge Hammer

Working...