Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Submission + - Judge rules that resale of MP3s violates copyright law 1

Pikoro writes: A judge has sided with Capitol Records in the lawsuit between the record company and ReDigi — ruling that MP3s can only be resold if granted permission by copyright owners.
"The Order is surprising in light of last month's United States Supreme Court decision in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons, which reaffirmed the importance and applicability of the First Sale Doctrine in the United States of America."
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Judge rules that resale of MP3s violates copyright law

Comments Filter:
  • From TFA

    "Courts have consistently held that the unauthorized duplication of digital music files over the Internet infringes a copyright owner's exclusive right to reproduce. However, courts have not previously addressed whether the unauthorized transfer of a digital music file over the Internet -- where only one file exists before and after the transfer -- constitutes reproduction within the meaning of the Copyright Act. The court holds that it does."

    So, transferring a file (legally purchased) for resale once, while deleting the source file just after the transfer is still a "reproduction". On the other hand, music industry sells online megatons of songs daily using the mega-reproduction of a single file - which reproduction cost ~zero. There is something deeply weird in this scenario.

In a five year period we can get one superb programming language. Only we can't control when the five year period will begin.