Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Submission + - The Interactive Voter Choice System, a solution for our broken politics (

Presto Vivace writes: "Un-Corrupting Congress: A System-Changing Solution

In 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a patent for the Interactive Voter Choice System (IVCS). In 2012, in a paper presented to the 12th European Conference on eGovernment, scholars refer to the web-based IVCS technology as a complex adaptive system (CAS) because it enables entire electorates to create complex systems of self-organizing voting blocs and electoral coalitions that can leap frog over the legal and institutional obstacles to the exercise of popular sovereignty that have been erected in democratic forms of government.

It empowers voters across the political spectrum to circumvent obstacles such as the institutional corruption of legislative bodies that plague modern democracies. They can mobilize the collective intelligence of their nations' electorates to set their governments' legislative priorities, consensually resolve disputes about what they should be, elect lawmakers who will enact their priorities, and hold them accountable at the ballot box if they fail to do so..

IVCS makes this empowerment possible by providing voters unique agenda setting, political organizing and consensus building tools that they will be able to access at to build nationwide decentralized networks of interconnected, voter-controlled voting blocs and electoral coalitions..

The networks' online and offline communication capabilities, combined with IVCS tools and the large scale collective action power of the Internet, enable these blocs and coalitions to build electoral bases larger than those of any single political party so they can elect representatives of their choice. .


This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Interactive Voter Choice System, a solution for our broken politics

Comments Filter:

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford