Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Submission + - What modern paradigms are worth pursuing? (

jd writes: "There seem to be a number of new paradigms emerging in the programming world. Templates and other similar features don't seem to have solved the problems of complexity in modern software, with the inevitable result of people inventing other forms of abstraction.

Of these, the two that seem the most significant are Aspect-Oriented Programming (an example of a compiler can be found here) and Feature-Oriented Programming (>a href="">again, a sample compiler).

Intel, on the other hand, is disregarding the complexity of the problems and is focusing on the complexity of the solutions. They have bought and fully opened the Cilk++ frontend for G++, which adds instruction-level parallelism to C++ programs.

But are these actually any use? I don't expect to see businesses crying out for coders experienced in FOP, nor do I expect to see complex projects such as KDE exploit such features. Although Cilk and Cilk++ have now been out a while, I can name no program that uses them.

Are they underused because nobody's heard of them or because nobody who has heard of them has found anything they're a good solution for? Are additional layers on top of Object Oriented languages the equivalent of Fifth-Generation Languages — a warning flag that the entire approach has hit a brick wall, requiring a rethink rather than a new layer?"

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

What modern paradigms are worth pursuing?

Comments Filter:

Forty two.