Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Submission + - Very Bad News for Fukushima (cringely.com) 6

Frosty Piss writes: According to technology journalist Mark Stephens (also known as I, Cringely), 'there is a 90 percent chance of a large earthquake in the minimum three years required to remove just the most unstable part of the fuel load at Fukushima Daiichi. The probability of a large earthquake in the 10+ years required to completely defuel the plant is virtually 100 percent. If a big earthquake happens before that fuel is gone there will be global environmental catastrophe with many deaths.'
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Very Bad News for Fukushima

Comments Filter:
  • But ... it's a technology journalist ... and he estimates a 90% chance... then there's a whole lot of ifs and virtuallys. So this is worst case... and what do the geotechnical engineers say?
    • You didn't read the article. He has some experience in this area.

      • by linatux ( 63153 )

        Keeping a hole in the ground filled with water doesn't sound too hard - tsunami might even help!
        Keeping the rods separated sufficiently sounds a little trickier, though I think the holes should survive more than a '9' easily.

        I voted the story up as I'd be interested to hear what others thought on the subject - certainly not my area of expertise.

    • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
      Hope the northern and southern hemispheres don't mix too much and watch the west cost glow....
  • You know his real name! And you're making sure we all know it! Ooh, aren't you special!

    Also, this is like 2 weeks old.

  • Sell the material off to other countries. "Pick-up only", of course.

He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.

Working...